- Agriculture.com Community
- Announcements & Forum Help
- Farm Business
- Young & Beginning Farmers
- Cattle Talk
- Crop Talk
- Hog Talk
- Machinery Talk
- Machinery Marketplace
- Shops, buildings and bins
- Ask the SF Engineman!
- Computers & more
- Precision Agriculture
- People & Rural Life
- Ag Forum
- Women In Ag
- Agriculture.com Blogs
- Your Farm in the Future
- Women in Ag: Lisa Foust Prater
- Women in Ag: Brenda Frketich
- Women in Ag: Anne Miller
- Women in Ag: Jennifer Dewey
- Women in Ag: Talkin' Turkey with Lara Durben
- Women in Ag: Heather Lifsey Barnes
06-27-2016 03:13 PM
Crop conditions barely budged.
8-14 is a bit warmer but quite a bit wetter in important areas. That can change, but as we've seen so can 16-30s. And those have an even lower probability.
Solved! Go to Solution.
06-27-2016 07:40 PM
I begin have less confidence in crop conditions all the time.
There is at least 10% in IN under severe moisture stress after a late planting. Bad combination, yet
the G/E actually went up, with only 7% in the poor/very poor corner.
The numbers don't correlate well to yield anyway, but it would be nice if they at least made sense.
06-27-2016 08:27 PM
I don't have any illusoins about that system but this doesn't provide any ammo for bulls.
But fwiw back in the bad old days when there wasn't much fundamental pulse it was a general rule of thumb that it took two weeks of declining conditions plus a bullish forecast to sustain a rally.
If that 8-14 forecasts busts I'm sure we'll rally.
06-27-2016 09:02 PM - edited 06-27-2016 09:02 PM
USDA's outdated-ness is and has been just plain ridiculous. The fact that they can't tie into reports from the FSA offices and crop insurance numbers is just plain crazy. Their outlandish claims of record yields before the crops are even planted should be terminated. And the crop ratings? I'm not sure who is in charge, but they should be looking for a new job.