- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
1-40, bad lawyers or bad faith claims?
The latter.
But good lawyers wouldn’t bring bad faith claims- that’s why they all quit.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
1 1/2-40
They picked up a temporary injunction from a lower court yesterday.
Being touted by the RWingospere as the Dynamite having gone Boom.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: 1-40, bad lawyers or bad faith claims?
" We can only trust mail in ballots if the signatures are verified" - Barack Obama 2008.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: 1-40, bad lawyers or bad faith claims?
You're pretty slow but at least you've figured out that the paper ballots matching with the electronic tally definitively disproves your previous lies.
I assume you're not dumb enough to believe that there are large numbers of ballot envelopes with false signatures. You and the legal beagles at Parler just think you n' Sid have found the magic loophole?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Update....1-41
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Update....1-41
Hummmmm. The PA supreme court says yeah we know what we did was illegal but we are throwing the case out because you waited too long to file a complaint. Now move along subject. You are too stupid to ask any questions.
Remember it was Barack Obama who said " We can only trust mail in ballots if the signatures are verified" That is no longer true in the state of PA. Mail in ballots only have to verify a signature if the vote is cast for a repub. Dems can haul them in by the truck load and everyone counts no matter what.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Update....1-41
Thick as a brick.
The item with the signature that is crossed with the registration is not the ballot. There is no signature on any ballot. When the signatures are checked the local officials who process them don’t see the ballot or know the affiliation of the voter.
Do you even vote? If you have, HTF can you be so in the dark? So confused?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Update....1-41
They know who the ballot is for when they create them. All they have to do is produce all of the return envelopes with signatures on them. Then they can prove verification. They can't because they destroyed them or they never existed to start with.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
“They”??
Who is “they” in this election fantasy universe of yours?
Ballots with choices already checked off before going into the packet you get in the mail or from the clerk at your polling place?
Wouldn’t people be calling that out? Calling officials. The cops. The media. Filling up social media with shots of the ballot that was already filled out for them when they procured it?
You are as full of ***** as Sidney Powell.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: “They”??
They are the dem vote counters who refuse to verify the signatures.