- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: “They”??
Good God!!!!
How could there be any benefit or advantage to that when the signature is in an envelope 2 and sometimes 3 steps before actually seeing and marking a ballot?
Stick to the crooked machines and the algorithms. That’s at least conceivable in some sort of a funky Sci-Fi way.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: “They”??
" We can only trust mail in ballots if the signatures are verified" - Barack Obama 2008.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: “They”??
Which they are before the “counters” see what is on the ballot.
Let Sidney handle this. If she quits will you?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: “They”??
Say the vote counters. Now they have to prove they verified the signatures. All they have to do is produce the proof. Should be simple.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: “They”??
.They wouldn’t have opened and counted the ballot if they hadn’t.
Look up your State’s election laws.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: “They”??
PA supreme court ruled days before the election signature didn't matter.
" We can only trust mail in ballots if the signatures are verified" - Barack Obama 2008.
- « Previous
-
- 1
- 2
- Next »