hardnox
Advisor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:09 PM
121/89 vs 3/1
Since 1969 number of GOP admistration officials indicted/convicted vs. Ds.
Man, I had no idea how bad this Deep State thing is.
Man, I had no idea how bad this Deep State thing is.
18 Replies
hardnox
Advisor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:16 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
For a trivia question:
Ronald Blackley, an aide to Mike Espy, was the one.
Espy was acquitted by a jury on all counts.
Ronald Blackley, an aide to Mike Espy, was the one.
Espy was acquitted by a jury on all counts.
hardnox
Advisor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:19 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
While you wouldn’t know it if you’re a consumer of RWNJ news, the Obama Admin was by far the purest of all through that period.
lnseiler
Senior Contributor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:27 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
Yeah, but you know, fake news....
What a great cop out that is.
Fake news, deep state, and the moon landing was staged, too.
What a great cop out that is.
Fake news, deep state, and the moon landing was staged, too.
rodgersfarms56
Senior Contributor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:32 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
Thanks but we are already well aware of how many Democrats have gotten off Scott free
hardnox
Advisor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:43 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
Are you trying to be the straight man for a comedy routine?
There is some parsing out to be done in regards to those numbers but that isn't likely to be a worthwhile undertaking here.
hardnox
Advisor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:46 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
Probably a matter of contention with 3020 who's our resident expert on benghazifastandfuriousirsgate.
Although given that the GOP had a congressional majority for all but 2 years of that stretch you have to be real disappointed in their production.
hardnox
Advisor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:52 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
Plenty of scammers and dirtbags in the D party.
But seriously, about the numbers?
Yeah, but whatabout?
lnseiler
Senior Contributor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
05:59 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
They got off scot free because they didn’t break any laws. How hard is that for you to understand?
Or, are you gonna claim the fix is in on every case based on party affiliation? That is truly thinking like a 5th grader. That’s like agreeing with the liar in chief that EVERY ONE (EVERY ONE!) of the women that accused him of sexual impropriety are liars. Not even close to believeable and if you buy into that you are truly hopeless.
Or, are you gonna claim the fix is in on every case based on party affiliation? That is truly thinking like a 5th grader. That’s like agreeing with the liar in chief that EVERY ONE (EVERY ONE!) of the women that accused him of sexual impropriety are liars. Not even close to believeable and if you buy into that you are truly hopeless.
rodgersfarms56
Senior Contributor
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-10-2018
06:30 PM
Re: 121/89 vs 3/1
IRS, fast and furious, collusion with Russians using the Steel Dossier to screw with the election, taking hammers to phones after receiving subpoena, illegal use of private server, leaking of classified information, lying under oath (comey doesn’t claim to be a Republican) obstruction of justice by withholding and redacting to save embarrassment. None of these would a Republican get away with. All you can point to is white collar crime and process infractions that have NOTHING to do with Trump. If being a self centered a $ shole was a crime Trump would have been in prison decades ago. But it’s not. You do not have a different opinion. You are a liar