cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Advisor

An hour or so spent

aSurfing “conservative” press sites and reading epitaphs re: Comey.  Cross referencing, of course, to those here at this forum who have ditifully picked up on them.  

Consistent in them all is, yeah, the IG didn’t recommend prosecution but man oh man, you should see what he did. Of course, if you read the IG report you’ll find there isn’t one word in it that wasn’t already publicly well known.  But still!!

3020 recommends not reading Ben Wittes, but then I can’t think of a better recommendation to do so.

https://www.lawfareblog.com/what-comey-email-report-really-says

13 Replies
Highlighted
Senior Contributor

kunstler

The old plantation spiritual comes to mind as the first in a series of DOJ Inspector General’s reports is issued — this one outlining the turpitudes of former FBI Director Jim Comey — while even more fateful inquiries by Barr and Durham grind away in silence and mystery, and one senses that sometime soon the whole hot mess of RussiaGate will land on the doormat of Barack Obama.

Many other (by now) well-known names have been implicated in this fiasco but Mr. Obama has stood aloft from them on a fluffy cloud of his own, enjoying his multimillion book deal, plenty of international travel, and shopping for real estate on Martha’s Vineyard, the elephants’ graveyard of the One Percenters. And yet, something wicked is creeping his way as investigators work up the food chain to discover why and how so many high government officials cooked up a scheme to get rid of the despised winner of the 2016 election.

President Obama, Liberalism’s great bowling trophy, its incarnate virtue signal, is going to get “the business” from the very justice department he sicced on his successor, only now under new management. If you think the Left has gone bat***** crazy since the Mueller report flopped, along with the supposed author’s Mr. Magoo-like performance before congress in July, just wait until Mr. Obama is called upon to do some official ‘splainin’ about who exactly authorized the operation to unseat Mr. Trump. I daresay the Left would rather blow up what remains of the Republic than see their retired champion in a witness chair, subjected to the peevings of mere mortal federal attorneys.

And yet, certain remorseless legal machinery has been set in motion now that could send a whole boardroom of former Obama administration higher-ups into disgrace, infamy, and possibly the federal slammer. Think: former CIA Director John Brennan in his future role as ping-pong round-robin manager at the Allenwood, PA, penitentiary; Loretta Lynch paring turnips at Camp Alderson, WV; James Clapper trying to catch a little tan in the ‘yard’ at Lompoc…. Somewhere along the line, someone is going to point a finger at Mr. Obama and those who were around him in the dear dead days of 2016.

There’s no precedent for this, of course, not even the case of ole Tricky Dick Nixon, who never had to take a witness chair in the Watergate matter and received a pardon from his successor, Gerald Ford, which made the whole tiresome business go away pronto. Wouldn’t it be a kind of poetic justice if Mr. Trump had to do the same for Mr. Obama? The New York Times would surely find a way to spin that as “racist.” CNN would declare war on FlyoverLand and send Don Lemon to Kentucky in a Lincoln Navigator with a light-saber to subdue the Ku Klux Klan and the satanic hosts of White Supremacy. Well, you see how easily this country could lose its *****.

In the meantime, cries of consternation rise from Right at the DOJ’s demurral to actually indict Mr. Comey on any of the charges listed rather explicitly in the new report. The explanation goes something like this: Comey gave an official FBI memo of his own composition to pal (and attorney) Daniel Richman, and instructed him to leak the contents (though not the memo itself) to a New York Times reporter. The memo involved recollections of a one-to-one meeting with Mr. Trump in which the case of General Flynn came up, with Mr. Trump making the case that there was nothing illegal about the National Security Advisor speaking with the Russian ambassador — since, after all, that is precisely what ambassadors from foreign lands are in Washington to do. I actually wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out that Mr. Comey was wearing a wire during that, and several other, meetings he had with Mr. Trump — before the president grokked that he was being personally set-up for an obstruction-of-justice rap and issued Mr. Comey a pink slip.

In sum, this particular matter amounted to a rinky-dink charge, where Mr. Barr’s prosecutors are concerned, compared to the greater and darker matter of Mr. Comey’s role in defrauding the FISA judges to get warrants to spy on US citizens. That will likely be Mr. Comey’s true Waterloo. So, he greeted this week’s IG report with a smarmy Twitter tweet celebrating his imagined “exoneration.” Imagine instead what his cortisol level will be in the months ahead as he awaits further moves by Messrs Barr, Durham, and IG Horowitz.

In an early riposte to all this bother, hapless MSNBC anchor Lawrence O’Donnell came out with a “bombshell” report that Mr. Trump had used a claque of Russian oligarchs to co-sign some loans in his hotel business — more proof that the President is Putin’s puppet! Alas, like so much other information seeping from the bloated, decomposing carcass of RussiaGate, the report had not been verified before Mr. O’Donnell opened his pie-hole to blab it out on prime-time TV. The President’s attorneys promptly offered to sue Mr. O’Donnell for defamation unless he apologized post haste and renounced the phony report. Which he did. Just another day in hysteria-gripped MediaLand.

As a sidelight, given the content of the IG’s report on Comey, one can easily imagine Judge Emmet Sulilvan having to now throw out the case against General Flynn, which has been fermenting in pre-sentencing limbo for the better part of a year, perhaps awaiting developments like these. If not, Mr. Trump will surely have to pardon the General. It would be real poetic justice to see him hired back to the job he was underhandedly shoved out of.

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: An hour or so spent

The IG did recommend prosecution but Barr said no.

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: An hour or so spent

Got a line to that? I guess I didn’t read enough.

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: An hour or so spent

That's a joke. Right?

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: An hour or so spent

I disn’t See anywhere it saying theHorowitz deferred to Barr or anyone else in making his recommendation. 

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: An hour or so spent

The Justice Department inspector general released a scathing report on former FBI Director James Comey's notes memorializing his conversations with President Trump, finding that he disclosed them without authorization "to achieve a personally desired outcome."

 

The 83-page report on Comey's handling of "sensitive information," released Thursday, said the investigation found "no evidence that Comey or his attorneys released any of the classified information contained in any of the Memos to members of the media."

But Inspector General Michael Horowitz faulted Comey for his behavior, saying his actions "violated Department or FBI policy, or the terms of Comey’s FBI Employment Agreement. As described in this report, we conclude that Comey’s retention, handling, and dissemination of certain Memos violated Department and FBI policies, and his FBI Employment Agreement."

Horowitz criminally referred Comey to the Justice Department for his conduct, but the agency declined to prosecute.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/doj-inspector-general-comey-violated-fbi-rules

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: An hour or so spent

I’d read that  in numerous iterations, actually.

And...no recommendation.  DOJ declined.  You saw somewhere that Barrr made that call?

 

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: kunstler

Jim K.  Consistent.  No different than ever.

Been following and reading Jim on a regular basis since the CFN blog came along.  Began on the recommendation of an authentically conservative acquaintance.

What remains the same here is how readily Jim recognized the future downside of neoliberalism when it  came on the scene in the early 90’s and how he consistently poses a degree equivalence between the worst of that school and authoritarian fascism.

You can pick up on somebody who sees what he sees.....although somehow you neglect Chomsky and Amy Goodwin. Or Black and Kelton and the UMKC crew.... he!!, throw in the egoist Greenwald if you want to...) but at least note that while they are critical of neoliberalism AND the surveillance State they somehow or other seem to always neglect to refer to Trumpism as a suitable antidote.

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: kunstler

Then how did you miss the referral?