cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Advisor

What it is generally referred to as

Would be “not dignifying the situation”

Let the indignation reign.

Possibly taking a cue from the way the hideous O’Keefe/Veritas story that got a considerable amount of mainstream notic having been thoroughly exposed and debunked turned our.

Trouble with that one is that it came out on Page One, and the debunking hit Page 3 of the Variety section.

 

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: What it is generally referred to as


@bruce MN wrote:

Would be “not dignifying the situation”

Let the indignation reign.

Possibly taking a cue from the way the hideous O’Keefe/Veritas story that got a considerable amount of mainstream notic having been thoroughly exposed and debunked turned our.

Trouble with that one is that it came out on Page One, and the debunking hit Page 3 of the Variety section.

 


 

Democrats use saying "explained and debunked" like an incantation. 

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: What it is generally referred to as

Chris Wallace says that Rudy G is dishonest and can't be trusted, but he does have some doubts that censorship is the right response.

Guess having some doubts makes Wallace a moderate when he looks in the mirror.

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: What it is generally referred to as


@rsbs wrote:

Chris Wallace says that Rudy G is dishonest and can't be trusted, but he does have some doubts that censorship is the right response.

Guess having some doubts makes Wallace a moderate when he looks in the mirror.


It is either the ballot box, or going to the cartridge box to save the Republic.