CO2 highest rate increase

[rawhide]

These guys don't drink kool-aid i guess  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/nasa-global-warming-letter-astronauts_n_1418017.html

And a big UH-OH  https://www.yahoo.com/news/nasa-data-blow-gaping-hold-global-warming-alarmism-192334971.html

[hardnox]

"If the authors of this letter disagree with specific scientific conclusions made public by NASA scientists, we encourage them to join the debate in the scientific literature or public forums rather than restrict any discourse.”

[hardnox]

"James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate News."

[hardnox]

The precautionary principle-

if AGW is wrong, then we're going to leave some of those non-renewable resources for future generations.

A conservative viewpoint, I think.

Not much, though, as the cheapest and easiest stuff is already long gone.

[Canuck_2]

Rawhide; it is easy to write a letter but when you are discussing science based findings you need to produce some science based findings that show the original info wrong.

If the published info about global warming can not be replicated they should be entering peer review commentw about the findings not bothering with letters.

If all the info they have can not refute the published papers and so they resort to letters then it just shows that the 90+% of climate scientists that agree with the climate predictions are correct.

[schnurrbart]

I would rather spread some fear instead of the manure you spread!!