cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
rawhide
Advisor

Re: CO2 highest rate increase

hardnox
Advisor

Re: CO2 highest rate increase

"If the authors of this letter disagree with specific scientific conclusions made public by NASA scientists, we encourage them to join the debate in the scientific literature or public forums rather than restrict any discourse.”

hardnox
Advisor

Re: CO2 highest rate increase

"James M. Taylor is senior fellow for environment policy at The Heartland Institute and managing editor of Environment & Climate News."

hardnox
Advisor

Re: CO2 highest rate increase

The precautionary principle-

 

if AGW is wrong, then we're going to leave some of those non-renewable resources for future generations.

 

A conservative viewpoint, I think.

 

Not much, though, as the cheapest and easiest stuff is already long gone.

Canuck_2
Senior Contributor

Re: CO2 highest rate increase

Rawhide; it is easy to write a letter but when you are discussing science based findings you need to produce some science based findings that show the original info wrong.

If the published info about global warming can not be replicated they should be entering peer review commentw about the findings not bothering with letters.

If all the info they have can not refute the published papers and so they resort to letters then it just shows that the 90+% of climate scientists that agree with the climate predictions are correct.

schnurrbart
Veteran Advisor

Re: CO2 highest rate increase

I would rather spread some fear instead of the manure you spread!!