Chamath expresses support for Nikki Haley

[bruce MN]

Illegible.  Your contentions contradict each other. 

President Biden is unlikely to be on the ticket but it will be on his own terms.  That after an incredibly successful single term. 

GOP aspirants seeking theGQP nomination don’t stand a chance.

The terribly tough to swallow pill for the high on crack RW nutcases to as they muddle through this is that former President Dennison is vastly superior on and much more appealing to independent and centrist voters in terms of policies and ideology than anybody who is going to emerge from the GQP clown car. 

[Edmund55]

(President Biden is unlikely to be on the ticket but it will be on his own terms.  That after an incredibly successful single term.)

If you don't think henderson is running you are no longer mandated to include the laughable radical left talking point that henderson's disastrous first 2 years even remotely could be considered successful. 

If that was your onion post of the day, my bad.

[BA Deere]

"illegible"?   I`m only "contending" enough to form a question.   As predicted, no answer.   Buttigieg?  Bloomberg? Warren? Booker?    Bloomberg would probably be the only Democrat candidate that isn`t a card carrying socialist, therefore the AOC squad would raise hackles against Bloomberg, making the House speakership rumble look like a Sunday school picnic. 

The fact you couldn`t come up with 3 names, let alone one name speaks volumes.

[bruce MN]

Innumerable.  Veritably generic.  The gap in the result depends on who the GQP runs. 

There will likely be people given consideration for both the 1 and 2 spots that you or I would never have thought of,  possibly not even heard of.

When one side totally implodes it leaves all sorts or room within which to function for the other. Your entire slate of potential GQP candidates is scropp.

[bruce MN]

A damned good one.  Good to see him brought up. 

[bruce MN]

You’ve most definitely got that schtick down now.

[Edmund55]

(Innumerable.  Veritably generic.  The gap in the result depends on who the GQP runs.) 

C'mon man, it's VP kackles kamala, what are you a misogynist? a racist?

[BA Deere]

"Innumerable.  Veritably generic.  The gap in the result depends on who the GQP runs. "  Bruce what you said right there is the Left`s playbook.   

If we run Trump (bull in china shop/high negatives) then the Left can run whatever bombthrower they want, because middle America will essentially hold their nose and "vote against Trump".   

If we run a Youngkin or Nikki Haley, then the Democrats will have to dig and dig to find a Democrat that they can pass off as "non-radical", such as Bill Richardson?  Henry Cueliar?  

Shouldn`t the nominee be based on policy and leadership instead of "Um, it`ll depend on who we are going to have to run against."?

[bruce MN]

It’s not up to me numbnuts. The potential GQP ticket will probably have quite a bit to do with how many steps forward the greater Democrat body takes.

Your team is mailing this one in. Your leaders are constructing a cult of celebrity that might produce a ticket George McGovern or Walter Mondale could have beat. 

[bruce MN]

Nah.  Just needing somebody in the spot(s).

Lots of hay down.  Will get put up when the D’s get the House back and insurgency becomes an inheritably uncomfortable and inadvisable option (SEE: Brazil)