cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Senior Contributor

Climate, most important problem facing US today.

Yes, climate is changing. However, human life is not the cause.

This is just an excuse to tax people and control their lives. Conveniently, the World Bank proposed a new global tax today:
http://af.reuters.com/article/energyOilNews/idAFLDE75407H20110605?sp=true

Google "climategate" to read:
- emails discussing "hiding" cooling data
- commented code from programmer discussing artificially adjusted temperatures
- calls for independent inquiry into global warming fraud
- scientists that question
- global warming advocates citing fraudulent data
- models being used to justify global warming have been inaccurate in modeling current weather

Climate Momentum Shifting: Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=927b9303-8...

New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=84e9e44a-8...

"Of 528 total papers on climate change, only 38 (7%) gave an explicit endorsement of the consensus. If one considers "implicit" endorsement (accepting the consensus without explicit statement), the figure rises to 45%. However, while only 32 papers (6%) reject the consensus outright, the largest category (48%) are neutral papers, refusing to either accept or reject the hypothesis. This is no "consensus.""
http://www.dailytech.com/Survey%2BLess%2BThan%2BHalf%2Bof%2Ball%2BPublished%2BScientists%2BEndorse%2...

Scientists with legitimate objections are barred and attacked by UN:
"UN IPCC reviewer and climate researcher Dr. Vincent Gray of New Zealand, an expert reviewer on every single draft of the IPCC reports since its inception going back to 1990, had a clear message to UN participants.
"There is no evidence that carbon dioxide increases are having any affect whatsoever on the climate," Gray, who shares in the Nobel Prize awarded to the UN IPCC, explained. "All the science of the IPCC is unsound. I have come to this conclusion after a very long time. If you examine every single proposition of the IPCC thoroughly, you find that the science somewhere fails," Gray, who wrote the book "The Greenhouse Delusion: A Critique of "Climate Change 2001," said. "It fails not only from the data, but it fails in the statistics, and the mathematics," he added."
http://nzclimatescience.net/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=174&It...

This is a complex topic people, research this for yourselves instead of believing anything quoted here (like the claim that 97% of scientists agree on it in post above).