Congratulations to the liberals

[r3020]

---

@schnurrbart wrote:
Let me use your logic. You come to me to buy a used car I have. I imply everything is good on it. You buy it and drive it around for awhile, then one day you and your family go out for a drive and the brake line breaks because of corrosion and your family is killed. Who is ultimately at fault?

---

Perfect description of Obama care.

[kraft-t]

wooo1 you way out there on that one!

[Samnospam]

You at least do understand what parabolic graphs imply for the future.  Some don't get it.

[hardnox604008]

Tea Party=Republicans=Democrats

If it weren't so darned serious the wisest strategy might be to try to get the other guy in power before the music stops.

But do you suppose that if we had a republican president and majority in charge during an economic collapse that all ot these guys would be calling for the military to come and save "the constitution"?

I find that to be one of the better questions I've posed.

[schnurrbart]

Yes, it means pure speculation/opinion.

[gough whitlam]

schnurrbart Veteran Advisor
Oct 17
You would rather have the country default on the debt?

That is exactly what he wanted but never gave it a thought that 44 would cleverly use it as the repig fault. He once again backed them into a corner and they couldn't see it happening. It is called wedge politics. Remember that 3020

[r3020]

---

@gough whitlam wrote:
schnurrbart Veteran Advisor
Oct 17
You would rather have the country default on the debt?

That is exactly what he wanted but never gave it a thought that 44 would cleverly use it as the repig fault. He once again backed them into a corner and they couldn't see it happening. It is called wedge politics. Remember that 3020

---

Why do you think I congratulated the liberals? They got everything they wanted and gave nothing.

[bruce MN]

The one where he expalined to you that the people who had voted for and signed the ACA didn't "get what they wanted" in this excercize?  They simply kept what they already had. Nothing more.

There were no winners as a result of this waste of time and money.  Only confimed losers.

[r3020]

---

@bruce MN wrote:

The one where he expalined to you that the people who had voted for and signed the ACA didn't "get what they wanted" in this excercize?  They simply kept what they already had. Nothing more.

There were no winners as a result of this waste of time and money.  Only confimed losers.

---

Oh, there were winners alright Bruce. Congress. Their staff. Public sector unions. They have proven they are above the law. Now they have another trillion dollars to buy votes and no more debt ceiling fears. The establishment rules, the peasants submit.

[schnurrbart]

I find it very ironic that the only ones talking about socialism are the ones on here who are extreme righties! Y'all keep talking about it and the rest of us may start thinking it is a good idea!