cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

With CV and the elections dominating. 

But likely to find it’s way:

https://mobile.twitter.com/nycsouthpaw/status/1235683676165476352

9 Replies

Re: Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

(Does DOJ need to listen to the Courts?)

You post this like it's a surprising development, this is exactly what activist judges do in a Trump Presidency.

 

Re: Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

What did the President have to do with the Judges’s Order?

He was dealing with the actions of 2 other individuals. 
And funny as xxxx somebody bringing up activist Judges on a day like today. 

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

Why? Did you not hear Sotomayor? The left have packed the courts with activist judges for decades.

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

(What did the President have to do with the Judges’s Order?)

All I've heard from lefties is how Barr is Trump's personal attorney Smiley Wink

Not to mention who the mueller investigation targeted and why this activist judge and his anti-Trump cohorts want this unredacted.    

Re: Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Crowded, for now, out of the headlines

(Loud and clear              thenation/sotomeyer-court-bias/eliemystal)

An opinion piece by a guy that wants white Trump voters destroyed reveals what exactly?

Didn’t take long

Hitting the headlines hard.

Deennison Tweets to follow I’m certain.

It was, no doubt,  a “perfect” summary.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Didn’t take long

You got him now!!!!!

 

IMPEACHMENT!!!!!!

 

GO NAN GO!!!!