Reply
Senior Contributor
Posts: 1,440
Registered: ‎06-15-2013

Re: Election results

I noticed that the map was all about percentages of State funding, and not in dollars, or amount of aid per capita.   I wonder why that is?

Could it be that the States who recieve the least Federal aid, as a %, spend so much more, that the aid is a smaller portion of their budget?

 

 For example, we can take my home State of Nebraska, which Ag's chart says says gets 34.2% of their State funding Via Federal $$

Now, go to #1 on the Liberal list, Mass, which gets 28.8%, of its funding via the Federal Gov't.

 

Now, go to another chart I found, where you can punch in 2 States, and compare per capita total State spending.

 

I ask you, which adds up to more Federal spending/aid, per citizen:  34.2% of $5439, or 28.8% of $8597?

 

Location Per Capita State Spending
Massachusetts $8,597
Nebraska $5,439
Subject Author Posted
This is a popular topic with new unread messages ‎10-19-2015 06:39 PM
‎10-20-2015 08:41 AM
‎10-21-2015 08:29 AM
‎10-21-2015 08:43 AM
‎10-21-2015 08:44 AM
‎10-21-2015 08:49 AM
‎10-21-2015 09:06 AM
‎10-21-2015 09:25 AM
‎10-21-2015 10:30 AM
‎10-22-2015 09:55 PM
‎10-22-2015 10:14 PM
‎10-22-2015 10:39 PM
‎10-20-2015 10:14 AM
‎10-20-2015 07:27 AM
‎10-20-2015 10:06 AM
‎10-20-2015 06:49 AM
‎10-20-2015 10:05 AM
‎10-21-2015 08:53 AM
‎10-20-2015 10:15 AM
‎10-21-2015 07:45 AM
‎10-21-2015 10:34 AM