Re: FBI issues BOLO on '02, Sammy
[The new extremism category focuses specifically on views that “attempt to explain events or circumstances as the result of a group of actors working in secret to benefit themselves at the expense of others” and are “usually at odds with official or prevailing explanations of events,” according to the document."]
I don't actually read or view some of the wacko sources very often. Just because their views are "usually at odds with official or prevailing explanations of events" does not necessarily make their views invalid nor untrue. This could be the FBI's way of squelching alternative explanations or viewpoints, regardless of whether they are fiction or non-fiction. Especially those explanations or viewpoints that they consider to be anti-government or anti-authority.