Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Senior Advisor

Fake science exposed

Not a bomb shell because people of reason already know this to be true.



As world leaders, namely in the European Union, attack President Trump for pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement which would have saddled Americans with billions upon billions of dollars in debt and economic losses, a new bombshell report that analyzed Global Average Surface Temperature (GAST) data produced by NASA, the NOAA and HADLEY proves the President was right on target with his refusal to be a part of the new initiative.


According to the report, which has been peer reviewed by administrators, scientists and researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (M.I.T.), and several of America’s leading universities, the data is completely bunk:



In this research report, the most important surface data adjustment issues are identified and past changes in the previously reported historical data are quantified. It was found that each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history. And, it was nearly always accomplished by systematically removing the previously existing cyclical temperature pattern. This was true for all three entities providing GAST data measurement, NOAA, NASA and Hadley CRU.


As a result, this research sought to validate the current estimates of GAST using the best available relevant data. This included the best documented and understood data sets from the U.S. and elsewhere as well as global data from satellites that provide far more extensive global coverage and are not contaminated by bad siting and urbanization impacts. Satellite data integrity also benefits from having cross checks with Balloon data.


The conclusive findings of this research are that the three GAST data sets are not a valid representation of reality. In fact, the magnitude of their historical data adjustments, that removed their cyclical temperature patterns, are totally inconsistent with published and credible U.S. and other temperature data. Thus, it is impossible to conclude from the three published GAST data sets that recent years have been the warmest ever –despite current claims of record setting warming.


Finally, since GAST data set validity is a necessary condition for EPA’s GHG/CO2 Endangerment Finding, it too is invalidated by these research findings. (Full Abstract Report)


Of course, this won’t stop global climate normalcy deniers from saying it’s all one big conspiracy to destroy the earth. They’ll naturally argue that data adjustments to the temperatures need to be made for a variety of reasons, which is something the report doesn’t dispute. What it does show, however, is that these “adjustments” always prove to be to the upside. Always warmer, never cooler:



While the notion that some “adjustments” to historical data might need to be made is not challenged, logically it would be expected that such historical temperature data adjustments would sometimes raise these temperatures, and sometimes lower them. This situation would mean that the impact of such adjustments on the temperature trend line slope is uncertain. However, each new version of GAST has nearly always exhibited a steeper warming linear trend over its entire history.


In short: The evidence has been falsified.

25 Replies
Senior Contributor

why hide data?

Penn State climate scientist, Michael ‘hockey stick’ Mann commits contempt of court in the ‘climate science trial of the century.’ Prominent alarmist shockingly defies judge and refuses to surrender data for open court examination.


Only possible outcome: Mann’s humiliation, defeat and likely criminal investigation in the U.S. The defendant in the libel trial, the 79-year-old Canadian climatologist, Dr Tim Ball (above, right) is expected to instruct his British Columbia attorneys to trigger mandatory punitive court sanctions, including a ruling that Mann did act with criminal intent when using public funds to commit climate data fraud. Mann’s imminent defeat is set to send shock waves worldwide within the climate science community as the outcome will be both a legal and scientific vindication of U.S. President Donald Trump’s claims that climate scare stories are a “hoax.”

Senior Contributor

I think this goes here - kunstler

This raises another question: who exactly is in this corps of “respectable people” who set the parameters of acceptable thought? Primarily, the mainstream media — The New York Times, The WashPo, CNN, etc. — plus the bureaucratic functionaries of the permanent government bureaucracy, a.k.a. the Deep State, who make and execute policy, along with the universities which educate the “respectable people” (the thinking class) into the prevailing dogmas and shibboleths of the day, and finally the think tanks and foundations that pay professional “experts” to retail their ideas.


The Overton Window can be viewed as a mechanism of political control, demonizing anyone who departs from the consensus of respectable thought, and especially if they express their heresies in public speech. This has consequences.

Senior Advisor

Re: Fake science exposed

This was some interesting commentary, though listing Leonardo DiCaprio as #5 was a bit much.


1.  They're wrong. The devastating heat they predicted simply hasn't happened. 


2.  They've hidden their true agenda. The zealots want to destroy capitalism and take over the world's economy.


3.  They're hypocrites. The hypocrite-in-chief is of course Al Gore. 


4.  They're authoritarians. Merely disagreeing with them is much like disagreeing with the Castros. The clearly deranged Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said that some climate skeptics should be prosecuted as war criminals. Last March, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch told the Senate Judiciary Committee that there had been official discussions about prosecuting "deniers."


5.  Leonardo DiCaprio. Here's a high school dropout who's become fabulously rich doing what kindergartners do every day — pretending to be someone else and imagining that they are doing something they aren't doing, and probably never will or would do. It's called acting and it pays some of its practitioners well.

But it doesn't give them gravitas, something DiCaprio knows he's lacking and is struggling mightily to obtain. The fact that DiCaprio fancies himself to be a climate expert and a model of environmental morality, and the fact that elitists have enthusiastically gone along with his adult playacting, are strong indictments against the alarmist community.



Seriously though --


The raw data (and it's sources) should be directly available to anyone, without being manipulated/altered before dissemination.   Averaged data should include consistent sources -- closed weather stations should not receive "assigned" nor "prognosticated" measurements, they should no longer be reported, and should not be included in "overall" averages nor trends, at least not without obvious qualifying remarks, clarifications and footnotes.


Computer climate models have not been able to reasonably/accurately/reliably predict PAST climate variations, why should so much emphasis be placed on their predictions for FUTURE climate variations?


Generally speaking, the Earth has been in a warming trend since the last Ice Age, along with a comparable trend in sea levels.


Etc, Etc, Etc 


And finally, premeditated and often political/monetary aspirations and conclusions, should not be the driving force in scientific discovery and analyses.



Veteran Advisor

Re: Fake science exposed

It's funny how DeCaprio is slammed at #5, when we have a reality star as a so called president, that the same could be said of him....

Tick Tock.....BONGx8!!!!!!!!

Senior Advisor

Re: Fake science exposed

But Trump isn't the one pushing fake science. The left have totally corrupted science to push their political agendas.

Senior Contributor

Re: Fake science exposed

'Science' is a process where every claim/study/ experiment and conclusion is put through a process of peer review by others in the field.

I will be waiting to see if the report listed here is maintained by those who will be checking it for accuracy just as it has tried to counter the many claims of previous reports.


It will be interesting if the report listed above is able to stand up to scrutiny.

bruce MN

Re: Fake science exposed

You're not catching on very well.  


The last or most recent statement from the right source becomes truthiness, negating all previous statements and information.  Making them default.

Senior Contributor

Re: Fake science exposed

Peer review means transparency in data, processes, and reproducible results.  

Senior Advisor

Re: Fake science exposed

People are making too much money from "global warming" for me to believe in it. The earth's climate has changed since the beginning of time, why should I give man so much credit?