Good lead

[bruce MN]

“Think about what Republican senators must have known when they voted not to convict Trump during the second impeachment.”

https://www.thebulwark.com/the-distinct-shame-of-senate-republicans/

Not that anyone here now that I can think of is actually a Republican. MSB and Dagwood were, but they are ancient history here. Craig was and I always respected that, in spite of the freak show. 

[Edmund55]

(Not that anyone here now that I can think of is actually a Republican. MSB and Dagwood were, but they are ancient history here.) 

So no democrats on ag-forum since TDS begin, and now it's bruceQ's opinion that there are no republicans on ag forum.

[bruce MN]

No one has ever said anything that would indicate or confirm that they are.

Show me something. Don’t check with The Party. They never form or publicize a

Now, as early on, it’s all  ”just know”.

[r3020]

They voted no because Trump was not guilty. Impeachment was never about Trump being guilty, it is just another tool for dems to use against their opponents.

[sam1wiseone]

Just like the first impeachment when the fbi had all the proof necessary that there was a very good reason to be investigating the senile idiots involvement in ukraine.  Not just not guilty but pursuing the correct coarse of action.