- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Improvement? Not much, evidence that's already been thrown once isn't evidence.
https://youtu.be/keANzinHWUA?t=428
What's going on here?
Think this is the only place with CCTV cameras around the nation?
๐๐๐
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Improvement? Not much, evidence that's already been thrown once isn't evidence.
Joe Stinky Fingers Biden and The mattress Heels Up the Ho Harris was not elected by the American voters. They were elected by the vote counters.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Improvement? Not much, evidence that's already been thrown once isn't evidence.
Youโll need a lot of the right players in on it:
Any stateโs legislature could, theoretically, pass a law setting out a new method for designating presidential electors other than popular vote. However, they would have enact such a law prior to Election Day; they could not retroactively change, or just disregard, their current laws to defy the will of voters. State election laws and regulations must be established and in place prior to Election Day โ they cannot be improvised or instituted on an ad hoc basis after the fact. Otherwise, every presidential election would descend into chaos, with state legislatures controlled by one party refusing to appoint electors pledged to the other partyโs candidate, as the Lawfare blog observed:
The legal theory that would allow state legislatures to go rogue and appoint electors without regard for the popular vote rests on an argument made by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. Gore, for himself and two other justices. On this view, a legislature is unconstrained in its power to set the manner by which electors are selected โ meaning that even after an election, the legislature could ignore the results and select a different slate altogether. A recent opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggests that Rehnquistโs argument may be again on the rise.
But advocates for this view need to recognize that between Bush v. Gore and today, the Supreme Court has unanimously decided that presidential electors are not actually โelectorsโ but are instead bound to the peopleโs vote. That principle that cabins elector discretion must also constrain legislatures โ at least if the country is to avoid an abomination that the Framers expressly rejected.
That said, the law is only relevant to the extent that is it enforceable. If Republican-dominated legislatures were determined to find excuses for ignoring their statesโ election results, a Republican-controlled Senate were willing to facilitate the scheme, and a conservative judiciary were compliant in upholding the results, then such a plot might indeed succeed
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Improvement? Not much, evidence that's already been thrown once isn't evidence.
@r3020 wrote:
Joe Stinky Fingers Biden and The mattress Heels Up the Ho Harris was not elected by the American voters. They were elected by the vote counters.
And China. Which ups the ante for their "collusion".
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Improvement? Not much, evidence that's already been thrown once isn't evidence.
@bruce MN wrote:
Youโll need a lot of the right players in on it:
Any stateโs legislature could, theoretically, pass a law setting out a new method for designating presidential electors other than popular vote. However, they would have enact such a law prior to Election Day; they could not retroactively change, or just disregard, their current laws to defy the will of voters. State election laws and regulations must be established and in place prior to Election Day โ they cannot be improvised or instituted on an ad hoc basis after the fact. Otherwise, every presidential election would descend into chaos, with state legislatures controlled by one party refusing to appoint electors pledged to the other partyโs candidate, as the Lawfare blog observed:
The legal theory that would allow state legislatures to go rogue and appoint electors without regard for the popular vote rests on an argument made by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. Gore, for himself and two other justices. On this view, a legislature is unconstrained in its power to set the manner by which electors are selected โ meaning that even after an election, the legislature could ignore the results and select a different slate altogether. A recent opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggests that Rehnquistโs argument may be again on the rise.
But advocates for this view need to recognize that between Bush v. Gore and today, the Supreme Court has unanimously decided that presidential electors are not actually โelectorsโ but are instead bound to the peopleโs vote. That principle that cabins elector discretion must also constrain legislatures โ at least if the country is to avoid an abomination that the Framers expressly rejected.
That said, the law is only relevant to the extent that is it enforceable. If Republican-dominated legislatures were determined to find excuses for ignoring their statesโ election results, a Republican-controlled Senate were willing to facilitate the scheme, and a conservative judiciary were compliant in upholding the results, then such a plot might indeed succeed
Blah, blah, blah.... even CNN knows you're full of BS Brucie. As I said, they were already prepping the lost souls for what is coming, but it is NOT the only way.
This will drag out and drag out. All the while, the people get educated on all the tricks. By the end, even the lost souls of the socialists will be demanding real vote reform.
That's a lovely "boot" Biden's sporting.... ๐. Looks a lot like the one McCain wore before he died....๐บ๐ธ
Sure was peculiar watching a man die of a brain tumor without any neurological symptoms... ๐๐๐
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
You are likely finally right about something
This will drag out.
Cohen, Niece Mary and anybody else with a long close history with David Dennison have assured everyone of that.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: You are likely finally right about something
Lawfare is probably a big player in this fraud. They certainly were in russia spygate. What a bunch of liars.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: You are likely finally right about something
What brought up some blog for you here?
I just looked there and they donโt have any entries re whatโs being discussed here.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: You are likely finally right about something
@bruce MN wrote:
What brought up some blog for you here?
I just looked there and they donโt have any entries re whatโs being discussed here.
@bruce MN wrote:
Youโll need a lot of the right players in on it:
Any stateโs legislature could, theoretically, pass a law setting out a new method for designating presidential electors other than popular vote. However, they would have enact such a law prior to Election Day; they could not retroactively change, or just disregard, their current laws to defy the will of voters. State election laws and regulations must be established and in place prior to Election Day โ they cannot be improvised or instituted on an ad hoc basis after the fact. Otherwise, every presidential election would descend into chaos, with state legislatures controlled by one party refusing to appoint electors pledged to the other partyโs candidate, as the Lawfare blog observed:
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: You are likely finally right about something
Lol. Turdy is still pretending that Dennison isnโt completely compromised by Putin.