cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
gh2002gh
Senior Contributor

Re: You are likely finally right about something


@r3020 wrote:

@bruce MN wrote:

What brought up some blog for you here?

I just looked there and they don’t have any entries re what’s being discussed here. 


 

@bruce MN wrote:

You’ll need a lot of the right players in on it:

Any state’s legislature could, theoretically, pass a law setting out a new method for designating presidential electors other than popular vote. However, they would have enact such a law prior to Election Day; they could not retroactively change, or just disregard, their current laws to defy the will of voters. State election laws and regulations must be established and in place prior to Election Day — they cannot be improvised or instituted on an ad hoc basis after the fact. Otherwise, every presidential election would descend into chaos, with state legislatures controlled by one party refusing to appoint electors pledged to the other party’s candidate, as the Lawfare blog observed:


😂

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: You are likely finally right about something

Funny ain't GH, Bruce and lawfare was 100% in on the fake russian story made up by the dems and putins employees but with all of this evidence they can't see voter fraud.

bruce MN
Advisor

Re: You are likely finally right about something

Nov 6?..

Lots of water...I.e. Sydney and Rudy *****....under the bridge since then.

bruce MN
Advisor

Re: You are likely finally right about something

What fake Russian story you talkin’ ‘bout Willys?

Barr and his hideous back of a napkin missive got him back in your graces over just a couple of days?

That’s all you’ve got or ever have had to hold up against it.

Well, now you have the Durham extension Red Herring. 

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: You are likely finally right about something

The one bought and paid for by the DNC and used by the FBI to get a spy warrant they all now say should have never been gotten.