cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
r3020
Senior Advisor

Here's the problem

Progressive hold Barr in contempt for following the law. Not that laws mean much to progressives.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/46982/heres-how-much-legally-redacted-mueller-report-ashe-schow

13 Replies
bruce MN
Advisor

Re: Here's the problem

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Here's the problem

The report is there for them to read.

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Here's the problem

(Progressive hold Barr in contempt for following the law. Not that laws mean much to progressives.)

 

Anyone think they ought to walkout of the house chamber to protest the shameful, politically-motivated vote holding the AG in contempt?

 

 

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

I'll answer the question

Russia absolutely has dirt on the Clinton's.

 

 

Kurt#1
Senior Contributor

Re: Here's the problem

Here's a radical thought ms. feinstein, go . . . read . . . the . . . report.

rsbs
Veteran Advisor

Re: I'll answer the question

the situation, as I see it, has always been pretty simple.....if you (Mrs. BJ CLinton)  don't what to be accused of being, and shown to be,  a lying, cheating, *****, the obvious solution is to not be a lying, cheating *****.

 

Sam, I think you posted something akin to that a long time ago, and I don't think the passage of time has changed any of it.

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

Re: I'll answer the question

If we just turn one more stone we'll find the great misdeeds of Trump,  yet we ignore the patently obvious, completely irrefutable, crimes and corruption surrounding the Clinton's and their army of partisans.  

 

It will always amaze me that so many prefer the powerful and corrupt, to the weak, ineffectual, bumbler.   How stupid can they be?

bruce MN
Advisor

Re: I'll answer the question

No Clinton’s are running for anything and nobody who is seems to be seeking their support or counsel.  Admittedly, that’s all a bit cynical as they are all bundled together in the fractious, all over the board, “feet firmly planted in the air” mess that is the Democrat party, but the fact remains that they aren’t steering or affecting it much.

 

That said...by the day...I become more and more thankful that the voting results didn’t yield a slim Clinton Electoral victory along with the GOP Congress that convened in 2017.  In the long run it’s better IMO that we are having this extreme test of our Constitution and multi branched system with the stars aligned as they are than in that arrangement.  The worst of our society are definitely operating more calmly, vile as some of their actions are, than had they been convinced somehow that they’d been screwed over. 

 

 

KNAPPer
Senior Contributor

Actually, there is no problem

Your article says, "To be sure, Barr is bound by the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e), which prohibits the disclosure of grand jury material."

 

OK, let's look at Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6:

 

Under Section 6-(3) - Exceptions

 

(a) information, whether or not it concerns a United States person, that relates to the ability of the United States to protect against—

• actual or potential attack or other grave hostile acts of a foreign power or its agent;

• sabotage or international terrorism by a foreign power or its agent; or

• clandestine intelligence activities by an intelligence service or network of a foreign power or by its agent; or

(b) information, whether or not it concerns a United States person, with respect to a foreign power or foreign territory that relates to—

• the national defense or the security of the United States; or

• the conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States.

 

Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_6

 

Barr is not forbidden to share the Grand Jury matters with Congress.