cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted

Re: Hillary better?

First, the Bush era deficits are with the war costs "off budget" an insult to anyone's intelligence.

 

And when you've maintained growth by encouraging rampant financial crime, the resulting collapse will impact revenues without question.

Highlighted

Re: Hillary better?

About 7%, as best I can estimate.

 

The tax cuts that didn't pay for themselves and the unfunded wars, about 20%.

Highlighted
Honored Advisor

Re: Hillary better?

The drug plan that passed the Senate 41 Repubs and 35 Dems back in 2003?  And was implemented in 2006, about 5 yrs ago?   Well at a cost of about $50 Billion a yr  50X5=250.  Figure strong at $300 billion and a current $15 Trillion National Debt under Obama...the percentage would be able 2% of Obama`s National Debt.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/15/us-medicare-part-d-idUSTRE76E61V20110715

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: Hillary better?

Obama won, he therefore was the criminals number one choice. Hillary then might have been slightly better. All relative though. Hillary is the more ambitious of the two.
Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: Hillary better?

So is the war cost part of the more than 15 trillion dollar debt or not? And explain how Obama has paid for his 17 tax cuts.

Highlighted
Veteran Advisor

Re: Hillary better?

Hillary is more politically experienced, bu that might not be all good. The Clinton administration was better at getting the American people behind them, but hillary doesn't sem as likable as Bill was.