cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
sam1wiseone
Senior Contributor

Re: Ummm? The Jury WAS not sequestered

Were the jurors able to read their biographies that were published in the paper, leaving out just their name?

"The Minnesota Star tribune published full bios of the 12 jurors. They waved their online viewing fee, so all could see. They didn’t include their names, but included places of employment, neighborhoods they live in, etc."

Re: Ummm? The Jury WAS not sequestered

Public information, published in the paper.

The horror. 

Is that going to be the Benghazi/Pizzagate/ Vince Foster stack addition on this? That the Jurors were scared and intimidated into the verdict? I’ve been spending the evening reading a lot of your cult’s garbage sites and commentators and that seems to be the developing pattern. No pretense of defending the convicted man. Just piles of that sort of garbage.

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Ummm? The Jury WAS not sequestered

(bruceBQ is unhappy)

Your cults garbage sites and commentators are calling jury intimidation and threats of violence from idiot politicians, just piles of that sort of garbage?  Oh wait, never mind - your the cnn man.

ACX66895171
Senior Contributor

Re: I know just what they're going to say now,...

Overturned....is this one of your guaranteed predictions? Those haven't always gone so well.

Re: Ummm? The Jury WAS not sequestered

Witness intimidation?  That’s a new one. I’d missed that.  I’d only read about Jury intimidation.

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Ummm? The Jury WAS not sequestered

(Witness intimidation?  That’s a new one. I’d missed that.  I’d only read about Jury intimidation.)

Yes, thanks cnn man bruceBQ, I fixed it.

Your cults garbage sites and commentators are calling jury intimidation and threats of violence from idiot politicians, just piles of that sort of garbage?  Oh wait, never mind - your the cnn man.

sam1wiseone
Senior Contributor

Re: Ummm? The Jury WAS not sequestered

No way I'm on that jury.  A not guilty would be commiting suicide.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Ummm? The Jury WAS not sequestered

The only reason to print their bio was for intimidation. The paper should be held in contempt. Clearly obstruction of justice. They want the trial thrown out and more rioting in the streets. Pelosi thanked Floyd for his death. She and the rest of the dems want more Floyds to advance their power. Everything dems have has been built on the backs of blacks.

Packard27
Senior Contributor

Re: I know just what they're going to say now,...

The law of unintended consequences is in play.

How many cops across America are having a serious re-imagining moment for their career options going forward? How many will still be in uniform and carrying badges twelve months from now? 

Anyone who thinks the police are bad right now should wait a bit until those same folks are either gone or have quitely withdrawn to their own versions of the Retired On Active Duty (a.k.a. ROAD) program.

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: I know just what they're going to say now,...

Good.

When there was talk yesterday of Blue Flu walkouts I say let ‘em.

Put out the Help Wanted sign.

Problem is you just gave Oath Keepers a huge bunch of new SA recruits.

Might need help wanted out at the FBI and DOJ but for a different reason.