cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Senior Advisor

IRS scandle

Hey Knapper, speaking of lies........

 

snip-

With Lois Lerner facing a contempt of Congress vote Wednesday, and  coming up on the one-year anniversary of the IRS conservative-targeting scandal  (this Saturday all cocktails consumed in America will be a tax write-off, The  Daily Caller has decided), it’s time to take a look at the pro-IRS case. What  have we found? There isn’t one. Every defense put forth by the Obama  administration and its allies in the Democratic Party and the media has now been  disproved and discredited.

No, we’re not talking about Jay Carney’s “fake scandal” line or  Obama’s “not even a smidgen of corruption” talking points. Those are just sound  bytes. We’re talking about the actual ways the IRS and its friends tried to  stop, stifle, or confuse investigations into the scandal.

So with Lerner expected to be held in contempt and GOP leaders  calling for a special counsel, here are the 10 major defenses put forth by IRS  defenders, and 10 reasons why the administration has literally nothing left to  throw at the wall:

1. Progressives were targeted, too

For months, Democrats and the media relied on the talking point  that progressive groups also ended up on an IRS “Be on the Lookout” list while  the agency was auditing and seizing information from conservative groups. But as  TheDC reported, IRS agents testified before the House oversight committee that  the IRS scrutinized ACORN groups because it thought they were old groups  applying as new ones; the group Emerge America was scrutinized for potential “improper private benefit;” and no evidence exists to prove that the IRS  targeted any Occupy Wall Street group.

“Only seven applications in the IRS backlog contained the  word ‘progressive,’ all of which were then approved by the IRS… [T]here is  simply no evidence that any liberal or progressive group received enhanced  scrutiny because its application reflected the organization’s political views,” according to an oversight committee staff report.

2. Everything Elijah Cummings said

Democratic oversight committee Ranking Member Rep. Elijah Cummings  served as his party’s point man on the IRS case, trying to block or discredit  Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa’s investigation at every turn. After Cummings threw a  fit — accusing Issa of being “un-American” at a March 5 hearing as Issa cut off  his microphone — House Democrats took to the floor to stage their “Lift Your  iPads” demonstration, playing back footage of Issa cutting Cummings’ microphone  in order to shame the Republican chairman. But the triumph of the Democrats’ high-tech Apple commercial of a protest was short lived.

It turned out that in the fall of 2012, Cummings demanded information himself from the voter-ID group True the  Vote, and emails showed that Lois Lerner fed  True the Vote tax information to Cummings, who might now face an ethics  probe.

3. No White House involvement

“Not necessarily the White House” was the phrase that some  Democratic “strategist” used when attacking one of our Daily Caller stories on  cable television last year. He meant that while the IRS may have been corrupt to  its very Washington core, President Barack Obama and Valerie Jarrett have not  yet been photographed sifting through tea party applications at a desk in the  Lincoln Bedroom.

But we do know, however, courtesy of The Daily Caller’s reporting, that Lerner exchanged confidential  taxpayer information on conservative groups with White House officials including  White House health-policy adviser Ellen Montz and Deputy Assistant to the  President for Health Policy Jeanne Lambrew, who just happened to be the most powerful official on Obamacare implementation within the  White House.

Read more:  http://dailycaller.com/2014/05/04/ten-irs-scandal-excuses-that-are-now-completely-discredited/#ixzz3...

7 Replies
Highlighted
Advisor

Re: IRS scandle

Using the government to attack political adversaries is as old as the pyramids.  Somehow its unbelievable?   

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: IRS scandle


@Samnospam wrote:

Using the government to attack political adversaries is as old as the pyramids.  Somehow its unbelievable?   


Not really. The most disturbing part is the media as an accomplice. That is how dictatorships are born.

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: IRS scandle

Isn't it contradicary, to say under oath, you did nothing wrong, and then plead the 5th, for fear that 'the truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth' would be self-incriminating?
Now, there are those who will say it is a 'witch hunt' with the GOP trying to find anything she did wrong, how is that any different than the NSA spying on us?  I have heard it said that if we didn't do anything wrong, we have nothing to fear, of facts coming out.   Why wouldn't that also ring true, to the IRS agents?

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: Why?

Because the investigation is an adversarial environoment with the sole purpose to do political damage to the adminsistration and their appointees. You have already had 7 inquiries into the IRS and have had your questions answered. But seven times is not enough and you will persue it until Bundy's cows come home.

 

So stick in your rear mr integrity, I wouldn't give you one ounce of cooperation because for you guys enough is never enough.

Highlighted
Veteran Advisor

Re: IRS scandle

So progressive groups were checked on! Thanks. Now if you could just get your pacsand special interest groups to quit trying for tax free status, they wouldn't be denied.
Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: Why?

Yup, it looks to be a 'witch hunt', too bad it had to come to that, but it also has been almost a year since the information request, before the IRS turned over the documents asked for.

 

Your reasoning pretty much sums up why I am against warrantless surveylance against US citizens.   If you do something to get on the wrong side of the wrong person/people, what is stopping them from watching your every move, waiting until they can catch you doing something wrong?

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: IRS scandle

I don't think the 'checking on' was the big deal.   The conservative groups were put in 'limbo' until after the election.   They weren't 'denied' status, but their approval sure took a long time.  In a lot of ways, being left in limbo, was worse than being denied.  A denial would have sent them re-organizing in a way to get proper tax status, a non-answer didn't give any direction what to do.