cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: "Who's being denied the right to vote"? The answer is ....

How will the change of election procedures keep anyone who is eligible to vote from casting a ballot?

rickgthf
Senior Advisor

Re: "Millions of unaudited or verified votes continue to be cast"?

In six months, you haven't presented one shred of evidence to prove your assertion.  

rickgthf
Senior Advisor

Re: Do you know what the phrase "self-evident" means?

Willful ignorance is a sin.

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Do you know what the phrase "self-evident" means?

(Willful ignorance is a sin.)

But not killing an unborn heartbeat  Smiley Wink   Dang hypocrats.

rickgthf
Senior Advisor

Re: Hypocrite?

 You kill 40 million cattle, 130 million hogs and 9 billion chickens every year, all with far more evidence of being sentient than a six-week old foetus and you're calling who a hypocrite?  Anyone who has raised livestock knows that they suffer the pain of death.

  It seems that you want to arbitrarily decide that a six-week old foetus is more self-aware than the millions of animals you kill & eat every year.

  And so who's the hypocrite.

  Besides, before science demonstrated what a foetus was you and your religion didn't even know or believe that it existed.  Now that you do, all of a sudden you want to give it special rights over the rights of the woman.  Why not give cattle or horses special rights?

  At least I understand that which creatures we give protected status to is entirely arbitrary and not some QAnon-type fantasy.

  

sam1wiseone
Senior Contributor

Re: If young children ask


@Canuck_2 wrote:

Completely agree with what?

That all those elected were fraudulently elected or that you just choose which parts to believe were fraudulent.

there are 2 options there and they can not both be correct unless you are choosing to just believe that all elections were fraudulent 

 


Yes it's quite possible that many elections were fraudulent.  

It is not rational to say none or all.  If 1 bank is robbed does that mean all banks are robbed.

Canuck_2
Senior Contributor

Re: If young children ask

Same ballot same system

If one is suspect then they are all suspect.

Why is only the presidential election being discussed?

Yes it's quite possible that many elections were fraudulent.  

It is not rational to say none or all.  If 1 bank is robbed does that mean all banks are robbed.

BA Deere
Honored Advisor

Re: If young children ask

There`s probably always going to be a minute amount of voter fraud from mail in ballots where a radical caretaker fills out a straight Democrat ballot for her elderly patient or a crack addicted grand-daughter fills out a straight Democrat ticket for her grandparents.  But if it`s in a red district, it probably won`t move the needle on the final results.  

But what`s becoming a cliche about no one accepting your personal check without a proper ID, some places say "No personal checks!  As of July 1, 2019" .  Stores prefer to take the 3% ding and rather have you use a credit card to ENSURE they will get paid.  Many places even get out the pen and mark a $20 bill if you pay with that small of denomination (what are we, George Floyd?  🙂  )   But as croÖked as everyone is these days, only fools even trust cash, so why the hell NOT require a ID to vote?

sam1wiseone
Senior Contributor

Re: If young children ask


@Canuck_2 wrote:

Same ballot same system

If one is suspect then they are all suspect.

Why is only the presidential election being discussed?

Yes it's quite possible that many elections were fraudulent.  

It is not rational to say none or all.  If 1 bank is robbed does that mean all banks are robbed.


Suspect, sure.  Total audit everywhere, I'm fine with that.  And if the poll books don't agree with the ballot count the entire precinct is thrown out.

Canuck_2
Senior Contributor

Re: If young children ask

if the poll books don't agree with the ballot count the entire precinct is thrown out.

So why is the discussion all about the presidential election only?

All those others should be on the hook too and if a member of the other party won then they must have been responsible for the fraud in their election because their opposition would not have fraudulently caused them to win.