- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
Oh. I get it. What the policy would be because it's the one the really wanted but wouldn't take the subsidy, out of principle, I suppose.
What did the 1800 get him in 2007? In 2004?. In 2000? Income's been stagnant since then and rates skyrocketed during that last era of free market utopia. Haven't gone up at anywhere near the rate they did then since '09.
Are you taking an on-line course in logic from 3020? Requires no course material or study time.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
No. You don't get it. Obama care never affected you.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
So when per capita healthcare costs were going up 70% in the GWB years you didn't think it would ever catch up with you?
Or that the billionaires were going to make sure that you suffered so that they could kill it and give themselves more money?
PS. might want to quit smoking too.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
Mine didn't go up 70% under Bush. But it went up 400% under Obamacare.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
Recalling your having told us about the crap policy you had that became unavailable. Because they quit selling it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
They quit selling it because it was OUTLAWED. Much better policy than we have today.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
35% compared to 70% appears to be twice as much but changes a lot when you put the numbers to it. And for me personally the biggest jumps came after the ACA kicked in. I'm not saying the ACA is all bad just many different ways to bounce numbers around.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: KellyAnne says
Yes, lots of problems with ACA.
But for anyone who isn't willfully oblivious, 3020's probably comes about because the GOP only wants to kill it and the lion's share- the huge jump in some individual exchange markets, would be easily fixed if they wanted to.
But anyway, people who weere still getting by on non-communty rated teaser rate risk pools were living on borrowed time.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Fake News
listened to the 830 am radio show for about half an hour yesterday on a drive
and they were really hammering the "20 million losing insurance" theme, and
even had a reference to Gayle King and Charlie Rose on the mother ship
thrown in.
Newsflash.....20 million Americans did not get "health insurance"....over 18 million,
(90 percent for you that are a little math challenged) benefited from Medicaid expansion,
with federal particpation for a year or two, then on the beleaguerd states backs, and
the taxpayers of those states...a time bomb waiting to go off. Thats why some of the
states said "no thanks"....they looked down the road and saw the smoke.
So somewhat over a million Americans got insurance, not welfare, and the cost of the
Obama program has been estimated at a Trillion for what it has cost the American economy.
Roughly a million dollars per recipent. Just like the $500 hammers the military was buying
back in the 1960's. But lets just parade out more "fake news" and pretend that it's a system
that is working and well thought out.
Just like the Hemmingway character that had his nuts shot off said "isn't it pretty to think so?"