Macleans article again

[Canuck_2]

Thought this article should be read by all US voters and then they can check how their own rational thoughts about which cnadidate will make the better 'leader' for your country.

Take a few minutes and read it all

http://www.macleans.ca/politics/hillary-clinton-and-donald-trump-are-not-equal-period/

One is Trump’s campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, who expressed outrage when a CNBC interviewer interrupted a discussion about the investigation into Clinton’s email to mention Trump’s hearing for allegedly raping a 13-year-old. “Oh, come on,” she said. “That you would analogize the two? Give me a break.”
And that’s where bogus equivalencies have gotten us: allegations of email impropriety are more villainous than those of raping a child. It’s an upside-down world where, were this a novel, Trump would be the buffoonish villain. Yet half of America see him as a “boss,” or a man who plays one on TV. They see a candidate with contempt for democratic and judicial process, whose lack of experience is his winning qualification, a businessman who has filed for bankruptcy six times. They see a hero promising a nostalgic return to the Neverland of American greatness, a time when men earned the bacon and women ran for the PTA. It’s like the real-life version of the Simpsons’ episode in which Springfield residents buy a faulty monorail from a con man.

Yes you can see where I stand with critical thought about who would be better for the position of President of youe country.

Rational critical thought leaves no doubt.

[Edmund55]

(Yes you can see where I stand with critical thought about who would be better for the position of President of youe country.  Rational critical thought leaves no doubt.)

You and McClains belief and opinion of what critical thought is and how it would lead you to vote for Hillary is somewhat amusing.  I'll base my vote on the facts, not you & McClains opinion & belief.

So far today liberals on here have tried the following:  Melania is illegal; Trump raped a 13 year old, when that doesn't stick you can try something else.  Lets try anything to get the crooked politician elected and then call it rational critical thought.

[Canuck_2]

When did he rape this 13 year old?

I understand he is going on trial for a rape in December but did not know it had been confirmed that he had raped anyone. At least not confirmed so far.

IF he wins the election he might be the first president to be inaugerated from behind bars but of course he will likely still be free on appeal at that time.

So wouldn't critical thinking say that the candidate that might have been careless with some emails is a better person for the job than one who is going to be in court for rape and fraud. Who has a rcord of multiple bankruptcies, who has fomented hatred and discriminated against minorities, who has no experieince in ploitics, who has accuasations of sexual attacks on women.

And you think it is amusing...............Hmmmm.

[Edmund55]

(When did he rape this 13 year old?

I understand he is going on trial for a rape in December but did not know it had been confirmed that he had raped anyone. At least not confirmed so far.)  

From your boy McClain's article that you posted - I said they "have tried the following".

Please post your "fact" that a Trump rape trial is scheduled for December - or is that just your belief.

(IF he wins the election he might be the first president to be inaugerated from behind bars but of course he will likely still be free on appeal at that time.)

The proofessor of facts throwing all kinds of speculation out today - Can't Trump just pardon himself like Clinton would do for herself?

(So wouldn't critical thinking say that the candidate that might have been careless with some emails is a better person for the job than one who is going to be in court for rape and fraud. Who has a rcord of multiple bankruptcies, who has fomented hatred and discriminated against minorities, who has no experieince in ploitics, who has accuasations of sexual attacks on women.)

I like that "might have been careless with some e-mails", yea just a little careless.

(And you think it is amusing...............Hmmmm.)  

Yes I do find your post rather amusing - the self proclaimed non believing facts guy throwing around speculation and inneundo.

[Canuck_2]

I came in for a drink and was going to post the news I had heard on the radio in the shop about the FBI saying there is nothing in the emails they found recently that change anything from the original finding that she was not guilty of any criminal activity and saw your reply.

So I went looking for a link to the story that has been in the news for weeks now if not months about the trial set for December about the charges of Trump raping a teenager and what I found is the young lady has withdrawn the charges because she has had death threats.

So Trump is off the hook for the rape charges because the lady has been threatened with death and Hillary is of the hook because.............. well there is nothing she did that was wrong.

BTW Trump is still going to court for fraud charges to do with his 'University' that stole from people .

So who do you want leading your country?

Rational thinkers find the answer easy.

Yes Trump might very well act like a tin pot dictator and pardon himself IF he is elected.

Is that who you want for your leader? A guy who is worth millions who thinks it is OK to not pay any tax while the contractors he stiffed are likely still paying taxes

Who did you say was a great wonderful person to lead your country?

[Edmund55]

(I came in for a drink and was going to post the news I had heard on the radio in the shop about the FBI saying there is nothing in the emails they found recently that change anything from the original finding that she was not guilty of any criminal activity and saw your reply.

So I went looking for a link to the story that has been in the news for weeks now if not months about the trial set for December about the charges of Trump raping a teenager and what I found is the young lady has withdrawn the charges because she has had death threats.

So Trump is off the hook for the rape charges because the lady has been threatened with death and Hillary is of the hook because.............. well there is nothing she did that was wrong.)

So now your position is that the Trump's scheduled December rape trial is um, lets see um no longer scheduled.

(BTW Trump is still going to court for fraud charges to do with his 'University' that stole from people.)

May as well throw this new speculative allegation out there, maybe someone will buy that now that you were proven wrong on your previous attempt.

(So who do you want leading your country?   Rational thinkers find the answer easy.)

Between Clinton & Trump I will vote for Trump, its not even close.  The liberal line about rational thinkers that you keep spouting doesn't work on an actual rational thinker.

(Yes Trump might very well act like a tin pot dictator and pardon himself IF he is elected.)

As I stated, so may Clinton.

(Is that who you want for your leader? A guy who is worth millions who thinks it is OK to not pay any tax while the contractors he stiffed are likely still paying taxes.)

Being worth millions doesn't bother me, Trump made his millions in private business & Clinton made hers as a politician.  Regarding paying taxes, you have no idea Harry Reid but anyone with common sense would speculate if a person loses a billion dollars 20 years ago and is still in business, that person probably paid at least $1 in Federal taxes.  Regarding stiffing contractors, you may have finally spoken the truth for once, and I don't like it - but I factored that into my vote and like I said, it's not even close.

(Who did you say was a great wonderful person to lead your country?)  

Unlike you, I haven't called any politician great or wonderful - your trying a little to hard.

[r3020]

Tin pot dictator.

[AllenJwi]

"tin pot dictator " Who are you to make any such statement. Let me give you a clue you are nothing but a fruitcake from CA that thinks anyone should value your opinion.

[jennys_mn]

Where's the taxes that were promised? Someone said maybe Sniffy would produce his taxes right at the end, showing his name glitters in gold.

Tell you what - the guy is a con man, and if I was looking at his taxes, I would be looking even closer now the he has refused to make them public. That alone should have cost him even being considered as a serious candidate. The Republicans are at fault for bringing a candidate that was not properly vetted. Maybe from now on, they will have to do "extreme vetting" of any candidate they bring forward.

Tick Tock....

Jen

[Canuck_2]

As of 2 days ago Trump has been let off going to court over rape allegations, because the accuser withdrew the charges after receiving death threats.

do you not follow the news?

It was new to me when I checked today, last I heard he was scheduled for a court date in Dec.

Trump University charges are still in the works as far as I know.

Fraud, false advertising etc.

Then you may get a bigotted, racist, mysogynistic, liar for your leader.

Yes I know you will say Hillary is a liar too but look up any of the fact checking sites and they will give you a score of how many lies each one has told and the score is not even close and then the degree of the lies should be considered too.