cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
r3020
Senior Advisor

Monoclonal treatment facing restrictions

It's like the government wants you dead.

 

During the week leading into the Labor Day holiday, DeSantis was on the road again, touting the success of Florida’s program in disconnecting COVID-19 infection from hospitalization in the state. Patients gave personal testimony about their experience with the treatment. Hospitalizations in the state declined 20% during the first few weeks the infusion centers were up and running. Then something interesting happened.

On Friday, someone who claimed to be an urgent care specialist tweeted that HHS had informed him that the government would now decide which facilities would receive doses of monoclonal antibodies. Jim Jackson wrote: “So now the government is getting involved in [read: restricting] monoclonal antibody distribution. Before, I could just order as much as we needed, and they shipped it next day air. Now a govt. commission will decide when, if, and how much I will be able to get for my pts [patients]. ‘Should you have any questions regarding this update in ordering and distribution procedures, please email the Federal COVID-19 Response Team.’ Wonderful.”

He added the alert from HHS that confirmed his assertion. Now, only facilities participating in the HHS Protect program can order the treatment, and the agency will review all orders. Suppose the current distribution map provided by HHS includes the HHS Protect facilities. In that case, the new order review process seems like a heavy administrative burden for the program. It may delay or limit treatment for at-risk patients.

Monoclonal antibodies are approved and recommended for outpatient use. HHS instructs patients who qualify to access them within ten days of symptom onset. Regeneron also has FDA approval to be used post-exposure and for prevention. All approved uses are time-dependent and not conducive to a burdensome order review process. The timing of the change in how health providers access them is curious.

If the supply is genuinely so constrained that the federal government needs to get involved in decisions about distribution, the question should be why. The use of monoclonal antibodies is restricted and only provided for specific at-risk groups. By managing and approving distribution, HHS insulates the manufacturers from actual market demand. Now, some at-risk vaccinated as well as unvaccinated patients require effective treatment, and it is constrained. If new variants emerge and become dominant, that trend may continue.

https://pjmedia.com/uncategorized/stacey-lennox/2021/09/06/why-in-the-world-is-the-government-disrup...

30 Replies
sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: Monoclonal treatment facing restrictions

Uber hypocrite Turdy pushing the fetus juice.

Who could possibly imagine that he’s a duplicitous liar?

Supplies are quite limited. No reason to let America’s Two Bungholes get most of it.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Monoclonal treatment facing restrictions

Why is it limited?

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: Monoclonal treatment facing restrictions

Cant kill babies fast enough.

Actually, only able to make a small fraction of the doses that it would take if every unvaccinated fool who wanted it got it.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Monoclonal treatment facing restrictions

It's been used successfully for months and is still in short supply?

rickgthf
Senior Advisor

Re: "Why is it limited"?

  Three-quarters of the world have little access to vaccines because they can't make it fast enough. And it's a lot easier to make vaccines than monoclonal antibodies.  But guess what, when you get vaccinated, you make your own "antibodies". 

   Why are the idiots refusing to get vaccinated but demanding expensive short-supply antibodies?

  

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: Monoclonal treatment facing restrictions

Yes.

Wouldnt be if Mr. Big wasn’t encouraging his idiot sheep to not get vaccinated.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: "Why is it limited"?

Why is an effective treatment in short supply?

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: "Why is it limited"?

Ask the company.

I assume because they misjudged the number of idiots who wouldn’t get vaccinated.

Although there may be other production constraints, like not enough babies to kill.

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: "Why is it limited"?

Anticipating your dimwiited angle, I don’t think it was the government’s job to create huge stockpiles of a $6500 a dose treatment when $20 vaccines would have made those superfluous.