cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
rsbs
Veteran Advisor

New Days Musing

was listening to a you tube rebroadcast from a non fake stream media outlet, and the newslady was referring to a 600,000 late night pennsylvania ballot dump, 600,000 votes.....570,0000 for jobiden, and 3200 for DJT. hmmm.

Pennsylvania bombshell: Biden 99.4% v. Trump 0.6%

biden

 by Paul Kengor

Spectator.org)

There are landslides and then there are landslides. There are lopsided votes and then there are lopsided votes. There are egregious examples of vote manipulation and then there are really egregious examples of vote manipulation. What surfaced during hearings in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 25, 2020, may set the standard for electoral outrageousness. An expert testifying to the Pennsylvania Senate flagged a batch of ballots that recorded some 570,000 votes for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Donald Trump.

Yes, you read that correctly. That would equate to Joe Biden bagging 99.4 percent of that enormous chunk of votes. That one batch alone would have flipped the state to Biden.

This bombshell was dropped last Wednesday at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg. The November 25 hearings, which began at 12:30 p.m. and ran for nearly four hours, were convened at the request of Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Adams, Cumberland, Franklin, and York counties). It was sponsored by the Senate Majority Policy Committee, chaired by Sen. David Argall (R-Berks/Schuylkill). Mastriano has called what happened “unacceptable,” and has called for the resignation of Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.

This particular gem was provided by Ret. Col. Phil Waldren, a former combat officer with a background in Army information and electronic warfare. Waldren, who testified along with Rudy Giuliani’s team, brought to the hearing his considerable expertise in analysis of election-data fraud. After Waldren presented his material, the chair opened the floor for questions. Rudy Giuliani went first, asking Waldren to clarify what his analytics team means when they talk about “spike anomalies” in voting patterns. These, as Waldren defines them, are “events where a numerical amount of votes are processed in a time period that is not feasible or mechanically possible under normal circumstances.” Waldren showed a chart with a shocking example of an apparent massive dump of votes for Joe Biden. Giuliani pressed Waldren for clarification regarding this unbelievable “Biden injection of votes.” Here’s the exchange:

Waldren: At the very beginning of the chart, where there’s a circle that says “On Election Day,” what that indicates is there’s a spike in loaded votes. 337,000-plus-or-minus-some votes that were added in there in one big batch. So that was an anomaly in the reporting. Normally you would expect to see a smooth curve going up, not any big spikes, that’s kind of what Greg was talking about, the anomalies of loading and uploading those votes. So that big spike that occurs there is a prime indicator of fraudulent voting.

Giuliani: And that’s [a total of] 604,000 votes in 90 minutes, is that right?

Waldren: Correct, this is [shows chart] 337,000 votes in that period of time.

Giuliani: And when you look at this entire curve, with all these spikes, can you calculate how much of a vote that accounted for for Biden, and how much for Trump?

Waldren: Close to 600,000. I think our figures were about 570-some-odd-thousand that all those spikes represent overtime.

Giuliani: For Biden?

Waldren: Correct.

Giuliani: And how much for Trump?

Waldren: I think it was a little over 3,200.

That’s roughly 570,000 votes for Biden and 3,200 for Trump. Biden scooped up this enormous batch by 99.4 percent. Incredible. Impossible. Scandalous.

Read more at: Spectator.org

so I googled it, and found the above article. Now, I don't know if this has been debunked by one of the fake debunkers....I am sure Bruce or Nutz or Tick Tock can find a scopes link where they say FALSE FALSE FALSE!!!! and then you read the analysis and its only 569,780 for Biden and 3,249 for Trump. Seen so many of these that I just wonder how stupid they think their sheeple are. Onlike the Russisa Russia Russia BS, I wanna know the truth on these assertions......if it's true it obviously smacks of fraud, and the election should be redone. 

1 Reply
BA Deere
Honored Advisor

Re: New Days Musing

If an election is close, "they" can turn it without raising an eyebrow, but Trump blew Biden out of the water so badly that there was no way they could get him over the finish without being obvious.  Now all they have is Paula Reid editorializing her journalism by prefacing everything with "Trump falsely claims....". 

She is a hot piece, I`ll give her that.

CBS correspondent Paula Reid on Trump's election challenges | KOIN.com