cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
verbatime
Senior Contributor

New “Politically Correct” Army Manual Defends Jihad

 

 

politics with lives at risk... like taking a self destruct pill !!!!

 

http://patdollard.com/2011/12/new-politically-correct-army-manual-defends-jihad/

23 Replies
verbatime
Senior Contributor

Re: New “Politically Correct” Army Manual Defends Jihad

Don't tell me this Muzzie obamma doesn't think anti abortion folks and Christians are terrorists.  Oh I forgot we're not suppose to use that word.

verbatime
Senior Contributor

Re: New “Politically Correct” Army Manual Defends Jihad

The Koran, the Book of Allah is it a racist book, antisemitic and anti-Christian ?

5.51 O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians, they are allies of one another. And if any amongst you takes them for friends is one of them. Allah does not guide the unjust people.

 

verbatime
Senior Contributor

Re: New “Politically Correct” Army Manual Defends Jihad

The whole Earth belongs to Allah and His Messenger as it is taught them.
Jihad is the highest and the greatest form of worship from Allah, a god of terror that calls for terror!

Allah perfectly reproduces the actions of the devil and is certainly not G-d!

And follow him, it is signed a pact with the devil!

What a paradox !

verbatime
Senior Contributor

wake up I can't say it enough

BA Deere
Honored Advisor

Re: wake up I can't say it enough

Thanks for posting Verbatime.  we saw this same crap under the Clinton/Reno regime, all sorts of `false flags`.  The Ruby Ridge guy was entrapped to saw the barrel off a shotgun, which resulted in a needless standoff and dead bodies.  If Weaver was left alone there would`ve been alot less bloodshed all on the hands of Billy Clinton.  The libs, if they don`t just flat out ignore this information, will come in snapping "It`s from Fox News, you rightos are dangerous!!".  One can connect the dots very clearly now, the day isn`t too far off where`s there`s a all out assault on the Holy Bible, you see the under pinnings of it now.  Atheists, who sorry to say read the Bible more than many of us believers can easily take verses out of context.  And the goal of one day discrediting the Bible as a `hate crime book`.  Here`s the question, if the Bible would be banned, would that be the last straw or would us frogs still sit in the pot as the temperature is turned above 212º?  That "Patriot"Act  and it`s recent tentacles, of which many good people have fallen for, will be the very thing that destroys us.

Re: wake up I can't say it enough


@BA Deere wrote:

Thanks for posting Verbatime.  we saw this same crap under the Clinton/Reno regime, all sorts of `false flags`.  The Ruby Ridge guy was entrapped to saw the barrel off a shotgun, which resulted in a needless standoff and dead bodies.  If Weaver was left alone there would`ve been alot less bloodshed all on the hands of Billy Clinton.  The libs, if they don`t just flat out ignore this information, will come in snapping "It`s from Fox News, you rightos are dangerous!!".  One can connect the dots very clearly now, the day isn`t too far off where`s there`s a all out assault on the Holy Bible, you see the under pinnings of it now.  Atheists, who sorry to say read the Bible more than many of us believers can easily take verses out of context.  And the goal of one day discrediting the Bible as a `hate crime book`.  Here`s the question, if the Bible would be banned, would that be the last straw or would us frogs still sit in the pot as the temperature is turned above 212º?  That "Patriot"Act  and it`s recent tentacles, of which many good people have fallen for, will be the very thing that destroys us.


As I have said several times, if the enemy controls the ballot box, the only resort left is the cartridge box..... and perhaps some nasty disease strain released in socialist and jihadist areas.

Nebrfarmr
Veteran Advisor

Re: wake up I can't say it enough

It has been my experience, that if someone attacks the source (it was from XYZ news, how can you trust that??!!?!?!?) instead of pointing out where the facts are wrong, it is because about all they can do, is attack the messenger.  If the facts were on their side, they would list them.
This holds true for people who attack Fox News, or Alternet, or whatever.  Disprove the facts, as even a blind hog finds an acorn.

verbatime
Senior Contributor

Re: New “Politically Correct” Army Manual Defends Jihad

BA Deere
Honored Advisor

Re: New “Politically Correct” Army Manual Defends Jihad

If I was the inventor of them drones, the first thing I`d do is have a contraption that would "fry" all the secret components, if a code wasn`t punched in within a couple hrs after landing/crashing.  I`ve just been too aquainted with Murphy`s Law to do otherwise.