cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Senior Advisor

New scientific study

Nature not man changes the climate. Another progressive hoax exposed.

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which 'climate change' is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint. Scientists in Finland found "practically no anthropogenic [man-made] climate change" after a series of studies. 

“During the last hundred years the temperature increased about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C”, the Finnish researchers bluntly state in one among a series of papers.

This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers' theory: "New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth's climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an 'umbrella effect'," the just published study has found, a summary of which has been released in the journal Science Daily. The findings are hugely significant given this 'umbrella effect' — an entirely natural occurrence  could be the prime driver of climate warming, and not man-made factors

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-07-11/scientists-finland-japan-man-made-climate-change-doesnt-ex...

15 Replies
Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study

Finally an intuitive assessment of common sense knowledge and observations based on true scientific data, not on political propaganda. 

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study

Will a tinfoil hat protect your noggin from those cosmo death rays?

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study

I wonder if the Kochs pay Sergei and Stash and their Romanian troll farm directly for putting that stuff out or there are more subtle forms of remuneration.

Although I suppose that in terms of common sense the cosmo death ray theory way trumps the fact that releasing a million years' worth of sequestered carbon every year might have an impact.

Explain to me again why The Vatican wants to ruin earth for our grandbabies?

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study

The irony is that none of this matters to those in power.  

Take the reply about tin foil hats and the Koch's, that's the response of those who have a vested interest in destroying the economy, in transferring American wealth, and who have or are making money one way or another from the global warming hoax.

While Al Gore and others make millions or billions from the hoax and are hailed as visionaries any contrary evidence

(while the anthropogenic crowd fail repeatedly to produce any real evidence) is buried and the authors attacked.   

Today's cattle are a problem but yesterdays 60 million bison weren't.  Volcano eruptions that have been proven to lower temperatures aren't important and the fact that sunspot activity overall has doubled in the last century with the apparent result down here on Earth that the sun glows brighter by about 0.1 percent now than it did 100 years ago.

None of these things and others are ever important.  Or take for example:

" Officials at Glacier National Park (GNP) have begun quietly removing and altering signs and government literature which told visitors that the Park’s glaciers were all expected to disappear by either 2020"  WHY?  Because the glaciers have grown.

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study


@Kurt#1 wrote:

The irony is that none of this matters to those in power.  

Take the reply about tin foil hats and the Koch's, that's the response of those who have a vested interest in destroying the economy, in transferring American wealth, and who have or are making money one way or another from the global warming hoax.

While Al Gore and others make millions or billions from the hoax and are hailed as visionaries any contrary evidence

(while the anthropogenic crowd fail repeatedly to produce any real evidence) is buried and the authors attacked.   

Today's cattle are a problem but yesterdays 60 million bison weren't.  Volcano eruptions that have been proven to lower temperatures aren't important and the fact that sunspot activity overall has doubled in the last century with the apparent result down here on Earth that the sun glows brighter by about 0.1 percent now than it did 100 years ago.

None of these things and others are ever important.  Or take for example:

" Officials at Glacier National Park (GNP) have begun quietly removing and altering signs and government literature which told visitors that the Park’s glaciers were all expected to disappear by either 2020"  WHY?  Because the glaciers have grown.


Well said, and now you will either hear crickets from the Communist Comrades, or a personal attack/propaganda tirade. 

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study

You blithering idiot.

Glacier is removing the signs because Little Lord Fauntleroy, the fake billionaire president, told them too.

Blithering idiots can be dangerous too, however.

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study


@ddgfs wrote:

You blithering idiot.

Glacier is removing the signs because Little Lord Fauntleroy, the fake billionaire president, told them too.

Blithering idiots can be dangerous too, however.


Have proof, Nox?

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: New scientific study

Yet you want him to control health care. Then you call others idiot.

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: New scientific study

(You blithering idiot.  Glacier is removing the signs because Little Lord Fauntleroy, the fake billionaire president, told them too.)

Mmm, or maybe it's because 2020 is 6 months away and even blithering idiots won't buy into the lie anymore.

If they change 2020 to a later year, say 2025, maybe you err, I mean those other blithering idiots can pretend to believe it again and lobby for more tax payer monies to stop the global warming and save Glacier National Park.  Every D candidate would pretend to be for it, hence they are all ......