cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
lnseiler
Senior Contributor

Re: Novartis

+1 on that comment Mr. Nox..
Just 1 of the legal issues enveloping Trump (and there are several) would have sunk past presidencies, and yet the loyal base refuses to smell that stench that you speak of.
And it’s really stinky.

Re: except

Although in fairness, nobody outside the outrage machine of the time thought that Billy really had much influence. Sort of a matter of two clowns meeting.

 

Given the $millions flying in and out of Cohen's shell company you'd have to rate it as a bit greater concern for the moment.

 

Oh I know, nuthin' to see here, move along, witch hunt.

AT&T

while they didn't get help on their merger they did get net neutrality killed, which will amount to more than $600,000 per day for them, I'm sure.

 

In fairness, that probably isn't what got it done and they and their fellow grifters no doubt spend many, many $millions more to get that done.

 

But still, as always, buying the government is the best ROI going.

Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Re: Quit pretending

(Mueller has so much info on the various shenanigans...it’ll take awhile.) 

 

Well we certainly know that Mueller's investigation into Russian collusion will be wrapped up well before the 2018 election as all we heard, from Democrats and their counterparts in the main stream / liberal media, is that Mueller's investigation is only about how to protect the integrity of future elections.  In order to protect the integrity of our future elections, Mueller will have to wrap this up so that we know how to stop the Russian collusion in this Fall's election.  So either wrap it up or quit pretending, that Democrats and their counterparts in the main stream / liberal media, care about Russian collusion in our elections and admit that it's just about bringing down the man whom smoked Hillary in the last Presidential election. 

lnseiler
Senior Contributor

Re: Novartis

If they didn’t keep uncovering more shenanigans re: Trump, the Trump
Campaign, and all his cronies, fixers, bag men and partners in crime it could have been wrapped up by now.
If you’re investigating a bank robbery and along the way it’s discovered that a murder was committed, not going to ignore the murder, are you?
Then you had to bring up Hillary again, didn’t you? What does she have to do with this? If she had won under suspicious circumstances i’d want her investigated and impeached if she had committed conspiracy, obstruction of justice, financial crimes, possible treason and
who knows what all.
Newsflash: she’s not president and she’s not part of the scene right now, Trump is and the stench around him is very strong.
Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

A clinton voter

outraged by money buying access is hilarious.

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

Re: except

The assumption being that the reason Mueller handed it off to ny was that Mueller himself couldn't use it.

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

Re: Also possible, re Avianti

Of course they have the same objective.

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

My Guess

If Mueller has something it will come out just before the election. if he has nothing it will go past the election.  Stopping the investigation without something on Trump before the election would work against the democrats.   Muellers job is to exact maximum damage to Trumps presidency.

lnseiler
Senior Contributor

Re: Novartis

There you go thinking again.
Give you guys a little time to think and pop! Go the conspiracy theories, persecution complex symptoms, etc.