cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
sam1wiseone
Senior Contributor

Re: Did they find any bamboo, yet?


@IH3719492 wrote:

Anything but where the systemic fraud can be proven, right kNazi?  

Just keep spinning, just keep spinning! 😂😂


sure want to keep things hidden don't they?

like when they covered the glass so no one could watch the count in detroit.

 

rickgthf
Senior Advisor

Re: "Paper ballots" actually they do.

   In Arizona (& NY, many other states), you fill out a paper ballot that is only read &  tabulated by machine.  If you look at the pictures of the current vote counting in Maricopa Cty you see boxes & boxes of ballots being hand-counted by some poor SOBs who haven't got a chance at tabulating & count all 2.1 million ballots any time soon.

  The whole thing was a publicity stunt & fishing expedition from the beginning, now it's nothing but a money-wasting embarrassment.

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: Did they find any bamboo, yet?

Thus far it has not been (re) alleged that there's a serious mismatch between  ballots and the number of people who checked in to vote- either in person or through signature match of mail votes. But you can, and I assume will, go back to that after everything else has failed.

So they are in possession of all the ballots- including the adjucated and provisional* ones that were ruled invalid. The ones that were ruled valid (by the bipartisan election board) are in the pool, but I'm sure that the cyber sleuths can find them. If there is no numerical mismatch and they can't find a disqualifying defect, then the only problem is that too many of them are for the wrong guy.

Trust me, it is a math thing. Perhaps the Milligan Bros. will weigh in with expert analysis.

What we have here is a case where the dog didn't just catch the car- it got plastered to the bumper when the brakes were slammed on. And now it is just laying in the rod and whinin' to beat the band.

*those provisionals are a matter of record. You can certainly check their info but I'm fairly comfortable that a bipartisan election board doesn't approve anything that looks very sketchy. But hey, go check. BTW further- you can check public records etc. You may not track them down and confront them- the gooftroop backed down when DOJ called them on that. Brownshirts showing up at your door saying "hey did you vote for........" doesn't actually require any explaining.

rickgthf
Senior Advisor

Re: Passwords, passwords, passwords, giving ...

Passwords, passwords, passwords, giving those yahoos the passwords would be like giving the bank robbers the combination to the bank vault.  They'd immediately go in, mess everything up and then say, "see, messed up".  

  They got the paper ballots, they don't need any passwords to prove the count was wrong.  Re-tabulate the ballots by hand, count them up and prove there's something wrong.  Otherwise, just shut up.

  

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: Passwords, passwords, passwords, giving ...

BTW, if you happened to follow the history of this slimy character who's conducting the "audit" he got chopped to shreds with his fake "forensic audit" of the Antrim County MI election*.

Not that it isn't now 100% gospel truth among the credulous goobers.

*where the clerk didn't see that she'd shifted the header on the Xcel spreadsheet when she sent the results in. The SoS office immediately reponded with "please check results- they don't look right" and the matter was resolved quickly. BTW, absolutely nothing unusual in the results there when compared with the history of the place or the vote in similar surrounding counties. Even if Biden had gotten 0 rather than 30% of the vote it wouldn't have been close to changing the outcome.

BTW, this is the same guy who claimed Detroit Lakes MN is in MI, etc. etc.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Passwords, passwords, passwords, giving ...

Thought you said it couldn't be messed up. Now you are saying these machines can be manipulated.

sam1wiseone
Senior Contributor

Re: Passwords, passwords, passwords, giving ...

All this wailing about the state legislature auditing an election to make sure its honest, as is its constitutional duty, sure makes you guys look like cheats.

 

sam1wiseone
Senior Contributor

Re: Passwords, passwords, passwords, giving ...

And as I've said before democrats are lying cheats that have had 5 months to cover their tracks.  doubt any sign of a crime remains,  stop worrying.

rickgthf
Senior Advisor

Re: "Democrats, five months to cover their tracks"?

"Democrats, five months to cover their tracks"?  There aren't any Democrats in any position to "cover any tracks" in Maricopa county, they're all republicans, in any position of authority or access to the equipment, anyhow.

    If you knew "they" were just going to cover their tracks, why even bother to make all the fuss?  Don't answer, I know,  it's the "trump loyalty" thing,  got to make it look like you believe the "Big Lie".

IH3719492
Senior Contributor

Re: "Democrats, five months to cover their tracks"?

"The router story so far:

Dominion allegedly ran the election in Maricopa county. [1] Maricopa county allegedly never had the admin credentials and effectively ceded the ownership of the election to an OUTSIDE VENDOR. [2]

Jack Sellers, Chairman of Maricopa County Supervisors, said in a press release that the network routers used by the elections department are shared across 50 different county departments. The routers contain confidential information and info about classified law enforcement activities. He notes that WHOEVER has access to this router could potentially INTERCEPT SENSITIVE DATA.

In a last ditch effort, Maricopa County Supervisors hold an emergency meeting to find a way to deflect the router subpoena.

The geniuses decide they will ask George Soros’ puppet, Maricopa County Sheriff Penzone, to release a statement claiming that THE ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT ROUTER IS USED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT. In said letter, Sheriff Penzone clarifies that ANY PRIVATE VENDOR who has access to the router would be able to expose vulnerable classified data, regardless of any steps taken by said private vendor who may say otherwise.

Now we have a conundrum. It’s alleged that Dominion ran the election and had control of the routers, since Maricopa county never even had the admin password to the machines. Sheriff Penzone confirmed that any outside vendor who has had access to the routers will be able to expose classified law enforcement data, regardless of what the vendor says or promises to do.

Did Dominion, a private vendor allegedly with access to the elections router, have access to the law enforcement networks via the router?
Did George Soros have access to the elections network via his puppet who runs the law enforcement network?
What are the other 49 networks also on that router?
Why do election servers need to be connected to 50 different unrelated networks?
Was election data modified by other networks sharing the same router?
Was HAMMER AND SCORECARD deployed in Maricopa County?"

 

Sources
1. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/maricopa-county-elections-witness-testifies-dominion-ran-en...
2. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/breaking-maricopa-county-not-admin-access-2020-election-mea...