cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Edmund55
Senior Contributor

Ole chuckles

Chuckles:   I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price! Schumer warned. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.

Chief Justice Roberts:  Beatdown reply.

Chuckles:  I was talking about Republican lawmakers, not Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

18 Replies
r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Ole chuckles

Hate and intolerance is the trade mark of the left.

Packard27
Senior Contributor

Re: Ole chuckles

This is what "by any means necessary" looks like in practice.  Call it "Might makes right," "The ends justifies the means," "The Chicago way," "Exitus acta probat," or "Power comes from the barrel of a gun." At the end of the day, it all means the same d*mn thing....LAWLESSNESS.

[File under: "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun." President Barack H. Obama]

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Ole chuckles

He's telling them they rule the way he wants them to rule or they end up along a road where they shoot themselves in the belly.

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

At the minimum

§ 11.406 Criminal coercion.

(a) A person is guilty of criminal coercion if, with purpose to unlawfully restrict another's freedom of action to his or her detriment, he or she threatens to:

(1) Commit any criminal offense; or

(2) Accuse anyone of a criminal offense; or

(3) Take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action.

(b) Criminal coercion is classified as a misdemeanor.

 

Although it could be argued that his actions are terroristic threatening which is a felony

No one is above the law*

 

*except democrats, anyone who hates trump, and all law enforcement.

sdholloway56
Esteemed Advisor

Re: At the minimum

Virtually identical to the language 'ol Horny Kav used on the Senate.

Re: At the minimum


@sdholloway56 wrote:

Virtually identical to the language 'ol Horny Kav used on the Senate.


the cognitive dissonance is strong in daddies boys.

//thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/469499-federal-judge-slams-trumps-attacks-on-judiciary

https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/11/07/this-is-not-normal-us-judge-denounces-trumps-attac...ttps:

//www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/02/25/trump-attacks-sotomayor-and-ginsberg-demands-justi...

I could put up more and more, but we are dealing with daddies boys here , so....

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

Not similar in the slightest

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: At the minimum

Apples and oranges. Trump never threatened them. Only said they should recuse themselves because they publicly showed bias. The "tolerant" left knowings nothing but violence.

Samthehumble
Senior Contributor

Re: At the minimum


@RJG640v8 wrote:

@sdholloway56 wrote:

Virtually identical to the language 'ol Horny Kav used on the Senate.


the cognitive dissonance is strong in daddies boys.

//thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/469499-federal-judge-slams-trumps-attacks-on-judiciary

https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/11/07/this-is-not-normal-us-judge-denounces-trumps-attac...ttps:

//www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/02/25/trump-attacks-sotomayor-and-ginsberg-demands-justi...

I could put up more and more, but we are dealing with daddies boys here , so....


Post the actual quotes where Trump threatened someone in the judiciary.   As maybe you know criticism is not the same thing as a threat.