- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Ole chuckles
Chuckles: I want to tell you, Gorsuch. I want to tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price! Schumer warned. You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.
Chief Justice Roberts: Beatdown reply.
Chuckles: I was talking about Republican lawmakers, not Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Ole chuckles
Hate and intolerance is the trade mark of the left.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Ole chuckles
This is what "by any means necessary" looks like in practice. Call it "Might makes right," "The ends justifies the means," "The Chicago way," "Exitus acta probat," or "Power comes from the barrel of a gun." At the end of the day, it all means the same d*mn thing....LAWLESSNESS.
[File under: "If they bring a knife, we bring a gun." President Barack H. Obama]
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: Ole chuckles
He's telling them they rule the way he wants them to rule or they end up along a road where they shoot themselves in the belly.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
At the minimum
(a) A person is guilty of criminal coercion if, with purpose to unlawfully restrict another's freedom of action to his or her detriment, he or she threatens to:
(1) Commit any criminal offense; or
(2) Accuse anyone of a criminal offense; or
(3) Take or withhold action as an official, or cause an official to take or withhold action.
(b) Criminal coercion is classified as a misdemeanor.
Although it could be argued that his actions are terroristic threatening which is a felony
No one is above the law*
*except democrats, anyone who hates trump, and all law enforcement.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: At the minimum
Virtually identical to the language 'ol Horny Kav used on the Senate.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: At the minimum
@sdholloway56 wrote:
Virtually identical to the language 'ol Horny Kav used on the Senate.
the cognitive dissonance is strong in daddies boys.
//thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/469499-federal-judge-slams-trumps-attacks-on-judiciary
https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/11/07/this-is-not-normal-us-judge-denounces-trumps-attac...ttps:
I could put up more and more, but we are dealing with daddies boys here , so....
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Not similar in the slightest
Another lie from the dishonorable resistence.
https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/read-full-transcript-brett-kavanaugh-201100363.html
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: At the minimum
Apples and oranges. Trump never threatened them. Only said they should recuse themselves because they publicly showed bias. The "tolerant" left knowings nothing but violence.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: At the minimum
@RJG640v8 wrote:
@sdholloway56 wrote:
Virtually identical to the language 'ol Horny Kav used on the Senate.
the cognitive dissonance is strong in daddies boys.
//thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/469499-federal-judge-slams-trumps-attacks-on-judiciary
https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/11/07/this-is-not-normal-us-judge-denounces-trumps-attac...ttps:
I could put up more and more, but we are dealing with daddies boys here , so....
Post the actual quotes where Trump threatened someone in the judiciary. As maybe you know criticism is not the same thing as a threat.