cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Revenge

I see where the country is headed. These people who lied and tried to over throw the president using the FBI and ILLEGAL spying were not fired, they were re-assigned.

Canuck_2
Senior Contributor

Re: Revenge

WCMO IF   any witness lied while on the stand then you should charge them and prove that they lied and then punish them for that.

until there are charges laid and proven they your claims are false and the witnesses that almost completely agreed with the same facts should be considered to have told the truth and why did your king not allow all those others with documents to come forward and testify under oath to prove those people wrong.

Thinking people know the fact that withholding those other witnesses and all documents just proves your king was wrong and was doing illegal things even though his henchmen acquitted him. And history will record him as guilty too as those documents will eventually come out and more of the people he hid from testifying will tell what happened to everyone

Canuck_2
Senior Contributor

Re: Revenge

And if they lied under oath why are they not being charged with perjury?

You don't suppose it is because they told the truth, truth that your king is trying to hide.

WCMO
Senior Advisor

Re: Revenge

Canuck, I don't need to do anything, I didn't say anyone lied, and the President has been acquitted.  If you're concerned about Sondland or Vindman(s), watch the full videos of their testimony, and then watch the full cross-examinations, it speaks for itself, unless you're wearing blinders and earplugs.  In so doing, ignore the leading comments and narrative from Schiff and Nadler and company, they weren't under oath.  Then read and listen to some news from less-biased sources.  You seem to be puking up Pelosi, Schiff, DNC, and CNN garbage.  Furthermore, the President might well have done everything the Democrats say he did, yet he was still acquitted.  I didn't say it was right or wrong.  I didn't say he didn't do anything.  The Senate decided that the House didn't prove their case, and that it wasn't the Senate's job to do it for them.  The Senate decided the charges from the House didn't rise to the level of removing him from office, all things considered.

Try reading my previous post more closely.

BA Deere
Honored Advisor

Re: Revenge

The only way to determine if Vindman (♫oh say can you see♪) doesn`t believe what his testimony was if he would agree to take a sodium penthathol injection to see if he really believes what he swore to.  But if Vindman (♪oh say can you see♫) really believes something that isn`t true, that`s a mistake, not perjury.

But at any rate Vindman (♫oh say can you see♫) testified against his boss...he doesn`t think his boss is fit to be in office, okay, so why would he WANT to work for someone like that?   Oh right right right, mo pension monayyyy$$$$$

President Trump can fire him and I want him to fire Vindman (♫oh say can you see♪) I don`t want someone that can`t be trusted working in the administration.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Revenge

No one lied more than Adam Schiff when he read from a fake transcript that only existed in his mind.

aljessen61
Senior Contributor

Re: Revenge

He should have done what your favorite leader did. Fire everyone on day one.

Hobbyfarmer
Honored Advisor

Re: Revenge

What we have here in this thread is a foreigner meddling 

In our politics.

 

Trying to influence thinking and changing results.

 

From what I can see from my lowly perch is you could 

 

Stay on your side of the line and work to clean up some 

 

Of the mess on your side of the line.

aljessen61
Senior Contributor

Re: Revenge


@Canuck_2 wrote:

WCMO IF   any witness lied while on the stand then you should charge them and prove that they lied and then punish them for that.

until there are charges laid and proven they your claims are false and the witnesses that almost completely agreed with the same facts should be considered to have told the truth and why did your king not allow all those others with documents to come forward and testify under oath to prove those people wrong.

Thinking people know the fact that withholding those other witnesses and all documents just proves your king was wrong and was doing illegal things even though his henchmen acquitted him. And history will record him as guilty too as those documents will eventually come out and more of the people he hid from testifying will tell what happened to everyone


They all lied and they must prove they are innocent. Isn't that the way you lib's think?

Canuck_2
Senior Contributor

Re: Revenge

Who is meddling ?

I just observe and point out the fallacies of some of the posts made here.