cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
r3020
Senior Advisor

Senators who vote to give gun rights to UN

It's only a matter of time until they take our guns and sell out our sovereignty..

 

snip-

 

Meet the 46 United States Senators who were willing to sign over your 2nd amendment rights to the United Nations. 46 democrats voted guns away The anti-gun senators are all Democrats or so-called Independents.

Senate Bill 139 passed 53-46. 46 US Senators voted against this: “To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.”

 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/04/here-are-the-46-senators-who-voted-to-turn-your-gun-rights-o...

5 Replies
schnurrbart
Veteran Advisor

Re: Senators who vote to give gun rights to UN

It would behoove you to actually read and learn what the UN resolution really is
schnurrbart
Veteran Advisor

Re: Senators who vote to give gun rights to UN





Home > Politics > Guns > U.N. Arms Trade Treaty
CATEGORIES:
Autos
Business
Cokelore
College
Computers

Crime
Critter Country
Disney
Embarrassments
Fauxtography

Food
Fraud & Scams
Glurge Gallery
History
Holidays
Horrors

Humor
Inboxer Rebellion
Language
Legal
Lost Legends

Love
Luck
Media Matters
Medical
Military

Movies
Music
Old Wives' Tales
Politics
Pregnancy

Quotes
Racial Rumors
Radio & TV
Religion
Risqué Business

Science
September 11
Sports
Travel
Weddings

E-mail this

U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

Claim: A U.N. small arms treaty signed by the U.S. provides a "legal way around the 2nd Amendment."


FALSE


Example: [Collected via e-mail, April 2010]

While you were watching the oil spill, the New York failed terrorist bombing and other critical crises, Hillary Clinton signed the small arms treaty with the UN.

OBAMA FINDS LEGAL WAY AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT AND USES IT. IF THIS PASSES, THERE COULD BE WAR

On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.

The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.

Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws.

Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment. This has happened in other countries, past and present!

THIS IS NOT A JOKE OR A FALSE WARNING.

As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.

Read the article:

http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed. This is a very serious matter! Silence will lead us to Socialism!!!


Origins: The concept of trying to crack down on the illicit trading of conventional arms through the development of an international agreement setting standards for legal arms trading has been in process in the United Nations (UN) since 2006, when the General Assembly passed a resolution titled "Toward an arms trade treaty" which called upon the UN secretary-general to survey member states on "the feasibility, scope and draft parameters for a comprehensive, legally binding instrument establishing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional arms." The administration of President George W. Bush was opposed to such efforts, stating that they preferred national controls to

internatonal agreements, and in several votes on resolutions and procedures related to a UN arms trade treaty from 2006 through 2008 the United States either cast the lone dissenting vote or was one of a very small number of member nations voting in the negative.

The administation of President Barack Obama has been more receptive to UN efforts to craft an international agreement on the small arms trade, however, as reported in the October 2009 Reuters news article cited in the example text reproduced above. That month, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a statement proclaiming that "The United States is committed to actively pursuing a strong and robust treaty that contains the highest possible, legally binding standards for the international transfer of conventional weapons," and the U.S. voted in favor of moving forward with plans for a 2012 UN conference on drafting an arms trade treaty.

Although the United Nations has been studying the feasibility of effecting a United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), the above-referenced piece of scarelore about the United States' having already entered into a such a treaty — one which supposedly provides a "legal way around the 2nd Amendment" and will result in a "complete ban on all weapons for US citizens" — is erroneous in all its particulars.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has not signed, nor has the U.S. Congress ratified, a United Nations (U.N.) arms treaty. In fact, the content of such a treaty hasn't even been finalized yet. A first draft of the Arms Trade Treaty was created at a U.N. conference in July 2012, but action on the treaty was indefinitely suspended after the United States (among other countries) declined to support a vote on the current text and asked for more time to consider the issue. The U.N. has since approved a resolution calling for a new round of talks on the treaty in March 2013, a move which the Obama administration has supported.
The Arms Trade Treaty has nothing to do with restricting the legal sale or ownership of guns within the United States. The aim of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty is to combat the illicit international trade of arms by "tightening regulation of, and setting international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons" in order to "close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market." The text of the proposed treaty specifically "reaffirms the sovereign right and responsibility of any State to regulate and control transfers of conventional arms that take place exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional systems," so even if such a treaty came to pass, U.S. rights and laws regarding the sale and ownership of small arms would still apply within the United States.
The Obama administration has stated that mandatory conditions for U.S. approval of such an arms trade treaty include the following:

The Second Amendment to the Constitution must be upheld.
There will be no restrictions on civilian possession or trade of firearms otherwise permitted by law or protected by the U.S. Constitution.
There will be no dilution or diminishing of sovereign control over issues involving the private acquisition, ownership, or possession of firearms, which must remain matters of domestic law.

No such treaty could "bypass the normal legislative process in Congress," as all treaties to which the U.S. is a signatory must first be approved by a two-thirds vote of the U.S. Senate before they are considered to be ratified and binding.
The President of the United States cannot enact a "complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations." The right to keep and bear arms is guaranteed in the Constitution of the United States, and in the 1957 case Reid v. Covert, the U.S. Supreme Court established that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the U.S. Senate.
There is no "legal way around the 2nd Amendment" other than a further amendment to the Constitution that repeals or alters it, or a Supreme Court decision that radically reinterprets how the 2nd Amendment is to be applied.

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp#1T4iozISLIH8WP4f.99
Flatland Hillbilly
Senior Contributor

Re: Senators who vote to give gun rights to UN

April fools day is here and you're the biggest fool this year!

Snooky1953
Senior Contributor

Re: Senators who vote to give gun rights to UN

20 was serious, moron!

ollie2655
Senior Contributor

Re: amazing all demorats

they are the party out to destroy america along with the dicktater