cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
AllenJwi
Senior Contributor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

Just what are you talking about?

OKdon
Senior Contributor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

Most of their crap is a figment of the elephants imagination. That is why after 30 years there has been no convictions for aledged misbehavior.

WCMO
Senior Advisor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

Don, that is obviously partly true.  Still, much also has to do with legal technicalities, destruction of evidence, the use of scapegoats, and the influence and power of the Clintons and those who back them.  Goes all the way back to Arkansas, maybe earlier.

OKdon
Senior Contributor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

Take it to court and prove me wrong. Endless allegations without litagation proves nothing.

AllenJwi
Senior Contributor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

 "We have to pass it to know what is in it. Americans are too stupid to undersatand", and the list goes on and on. You people are the cause of all this, you will be the destruction of this country. Better get your head out before it is all over with.

WCMO
Senior Advisor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

Don, it has as much to do with the long and growing list as it does anything else.  The obvious lies and deception, whether they're in jail or not.  Some of the best have tried to make some allegations "stick", so litigation is not necessarily the point, nor the answer -- it is the long and growing list, whether proven or not.  Enough is enough.

 

And, again, Trump is not a good answer, we do need some higher standards.

RJG640v8
Advisor

Well said WCMO

Would kudos if it was available here.

bruce MN
Advisor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

Quite certain that anyone here among the tenured regulars  "just knows".

AllenJwi
Senior Contributor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

   "just knows".  And you think the right is messed up.

northnd
Senior Contributor

Re: Still Defending Trump - Really?

My God, it is unbelievable how any side in this political maelstrom can think their "chosen ones" are beneath contempt. Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner, Ted Kennedy, Donald Trump, Gary Hart. You could go on and on with sexual bigots from both sides of the aisle. Yet, because they are yours, you turn a blind eye and chastise the other side. JFK in today's journalistic, internet age would have been torn to shreds if by no one else than Wikileaks. Doesn't make what any of them did right. Comes down to what you are willing to overlook to place a check by their name I guess.