cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
UNIranch
Senior Contributor

Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

Trump has tapped into a vein this cycle and I believe that willful ignorance is a HUUUUGE (heh heh)part of it...he rambles off lies in a Gish Gallop format and by the time one lie is found out there are three more out there...we have a very good example of that going on right here with Craigo...he has posted something that is a complete lie and he HAAAAS to know it....or....he is an irresponsible citizen to this country....perpitrating a lie would make one a liar as well...neat thing is admission to such lie usually works out better than just ignoring the fact that you just posted fiction...and not even good fiction...your Benghazi meme is a fake and you should be a good citizen and fight your battle with Clinton by using FACTS...arent there enough???..always wondered why those so eager to post an affermation almost always do it without even thinking....WITHOUT EVEN THINKING!!...is that how you vote Craigo??...you are called out on your BS...and so should Trump...nail him down on it all...soo Craigo what say you on this falsehood you posted...did you know it was false??YES or NO!!!LMAO!

29 Replies
r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject


@UNIranch wrote:

Trump has tapped into a vein this cycle and I believe that willful ignorance is a HUUUUGE (heh heh)part of it...he rambles off lies in a Gish Gallop format and by the time one lie is found out there are three more out there...we have a very good example of that going on right here with Craigo...he has posted something that is a complete lie and he HAAAAS to know it....or....he is an irresponsible citizen to this country....perpitrating a lie would make one a liar as well...neat thing is admission to such lie usually works out better than just ignoring the fact that you just posted fiction...and not even good fiction...your Benghazi meme is a fake and you should be a good citizen and fight your battle with Clinton by using FACTS...arent there enough???..always wondered why those so eager to post an affermation almost always do it without even thinking....WITHOUT EVEN THINKING!!...is that how you vote Craigo??...you are called out on your BS...and so should Trump...nail him down on it all...soo Craigo what say you on this falsehood you posted...did you know it was false??YES or NO!!!LMAO!


The biggest benghazi lie was told by Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration blaming it on a film that no one saw and sending the film maker to jail for a year. All to cover for their competence.

hardnox
Advisor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

Godwin Alert,  although not necessarily trying to equate equivalency, yet.

 

But I was again thinking about the Allies' experience with occupied Germany where they found that to a large extent, the surviving adults were immune to any significant re-education. The response was generally to the effect of "given the intolerable state of things what would you have had us do?"

 

The republic depends on an informed citizenry but there is little or no immediate personal cost to going off the rails. If your peer group is herding in that direction there's actually a greater cost to dissenting.

 

And if it all goes very wrong you won't recognize your own part in it.

UNIranch
Senior Contributor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

This is still another example of willful ignorance...this man would have been sent to jail wether the attack happened or not for a parole violation of using a computer without prior consent from supervisor of his probation...thats why he ended up in jail...to say Obama and Clinton put him in jail sounds like something you heard from Alex Jones...as far as what was reported after the attacks you can argue that it wasnt factually accurate to say the film sparked the violence there but there were other areas where violence was happening in reaction to the video...its easy to reverse engineer the whole thing and try and say without a doubt that we should have been able to thwart the attack but of course the only thing with 20/20 vsion must be 30/20...so I say again if you gentlemen want to attack Clinton thats great...I cant stand her but do it with facts and only facts...not heresay and partisian rehtoric..anything less than the WHOLE truth isnt the truth at all...affermation of ones feelings dont qualify as facts either...

hardnox
Advisor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

More Godwin.

 

In this matter the saving grace of the USA is diversity.

 

Even though Germany had only been united for a scarce 70 years it was highly homogeneous and the National Socialist pitch even worked well across the historic Catholic/Protestant divide.

 

Probably the best anyone can muster in the 21st century USA is a highly energized large minority. BTW, that is an approximate description of the electoral base of our ruling party since 2008- Republican obstructionists.

 

They really only lost, narrowly on one significant initiative- ACA- and are still steaming over it.

hardnox
Advisor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

For better or worse I've accepted my role as a slightly active centrist republican of the time in enabling the financial liberalizations of the 90s. I pretty much bought that crap hook line and sinker.

 

And in 2000 I voted for GWB- didn't like Clinton, still don't, but thought a change was in order. So I own a tiny  part of that disaster.

 

Couldn't even get myself to vote D in 2004- did a throwaway for RP.

 

I'm sorry.

r3020
Senior Advisor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject


@UNIranch wrote:

This is still another example of willful ignorance...this man would have been sent to jail wether the attack happened or not for a parole violation of using a computer without prior consent from supervisor of his probation...thats why he ended up in jail...to say Obama and Clinton put him in jail sounds like something you heard from Alex Jones...as far as what was reported after the attacks you can argue that it wasnt factually accurate to say the film sparked the violence there but there were other areas where violence was happening in reaction to the video...its easy to reverse engineer the whole thing and try and say without a doubt that we should have been able to thwart the attack but of course the only thing with 20/20 vsion must be 30/20...so I say again if you gentlemen want to attack Clinton thats great...I cant stand her but do it with facts and only facts...not heresay and partisian rehtoric..anything less than the WHOLE truth isnt the truth at all...affermation of ones feelings dont qualify as facts either...


She said the film maker would be prosecuted before she knew who the film maker was. When the administration sent Rice out to the Sunday talk show they knew the message she was sent to spread was nothing but a lie to divert attention from the administration. It was a lie with consequences.

schnurrbart
Veteran Advisor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

No, the biggest lie is the one you insist on telling even though you know it isn't true.

hardnox
Advisor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

Careful there UNLranch.

 

You're taking on Ag Forum's #1 authority on solyndrabenghaziIRSfastandfuriousgate.

UNIranch
Senior Contributor

Re: Still interested in this willful ignorance subject

I havent heard that clip...could you produce that audio...