Guess I used the wrong S word.
Here's the post again:
The USA had a contract with the Shah of Iran. The Shah got deposed during
the Iranian revolution....no longer a contract in place, and the USA spent
much more than $400 million on military operations in that cesspool.
Why on earth would you throw good money back into something like that?
And how would any idiot think that paying $100 million, plus interest, for
each American hostage would not encourage future hostage situations?
Back on the lack of a contract...after the British lost the American revolution,
do you think they paid the revolutionaries any money? You think George
Washington paid the bills of the British soldiers?
this whole deals smells. Let the kool aid drinkers try to spin it all they can...
its a deal low intellect voters can understand.
