cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Frequent Contributor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)

Highlighted
Frequent Contributor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)

Video discussion of the above in easier to digest form.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)

I mentioned only Georgia because you mentioned Georgia and it is also the subject of this post. We shall see what happens. I appreciate the straight answer by the way.

Highlighted
Frequent Contributor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)


@KNAPPer wrote:

I mentioned only Georgia because you mentioned Georgia and it is also the subject of this post. We shall see what happens. I appreciate the straight answer by the way.


👍

 

I took the statement about Biden still having 290 the wrong way then.  

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: The Nights Lights went out Georgia (election)

That's one of the problems -- a 'recount' is NOT an 'audit', although several news stories are calling the Georgia 'recount' an 'audit', it wasn't.  Yes, they can recount all they want, and the result should come out essentially the same every time if all were counted.   

- Where voting was done by machine using touchscreens, if a paper ballot exists in any form, it was produced by the machine, and could have been altered by the machine.  Most 'recounting' in these cases is done by repeating the machine process used originally, and should provide nearly the exact result as the original count, unless part of the results were stored on a thumbdrive, etc., and somehow someone forgot to add them back in.  Paper ballots printed by the machines serve no useful audit purpose other than to track the accuracy of the machine itself relative to what the machine itself says.

- Where vote counts exceed registered voters, and because ballots in the box are anonymous, even reconciling the ballot counts back to the voter registry will not resolve the discrepancy.  Same for 'stuffed' ballots.  If these situations can be proven, either by registry comparison to ballot counts, or by statistical analysis and comparisons, it still doesn't provide a method to expropriate a 'right' answer, yet could provide a valid reason to throw out the count.

- Mailed ballots that were postmarked or received after state deadline dates/times can only be identified/verified if the ballots remained with the envelopes in which they arrived.  Don't think they do.  In Pennsylvania, they were ordered to keep those ballots segregated, though they still included them in the counts, and whether or not all of them were kept segregated is likely not possible to prove one way or the other.

- Even if they are willing and able to identify illegal voters, they likely cannot identify the actual illegal ballots that were cast.  This is something that needed to be done at the polling places, and represent much of the reason for 'poll watchers'.  Where distances were too great to allow adequate verification by poll watchers, and/or where phones/videos were not allowed during the process, we can only rely on the affidavits of the watchers to identify and describe the problems (that should have been immediately addressed via calling in the appropriate policing authorities as it happened).  To even the untrained and mentally challenged, the affidavits are adequate to question the process in several areas.

- Analytical and statistical method evidence seems strong in several locations, and has been presented by several internet sources.  Still, the silver bullet is likely the source code that might show where it allows alterations of the voter ballot or count data.

- There is no valid reason for ballot information or count processing to travel thru servers or storage devices in foreign countries, such as Canada, Spain or Germany, as has been alleged.  

- Until those who stand accused by the affidavits, etc., are actually questioned under oath, we will not have a complete picture of what likely happened.

 

After enduring 4 years of questioning of the 2016 election results, it seems a few weeks to look into the allegations surrounding the 2020 election is not too much to ask.  Even the 2000 election controversy was not resolved until (I think) mid-December, after the Supreme Court stepped in to stop the Florida recounts -- subsequent continued unofficial recounts determined that Bush still won. 

All sides of the controversy should welcome the discussion of the problems, along with any investigations, etc., which should result in a less objectionable voting system in the future.  Objections to the investigations, etc., imply that there is something questionable or illegal being hidden.

 

Highlighted
Senior Advisor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)

Deserves to be looked into. Would you not agree Knapper? There are questions that need answers.

 

Pennsylvania lawmakers had scheduled the hearing with the voting machine manufacturer “to help identify and correct any irregularities in the election process,” according to the House Republican Caucus.

It is vitally important voters have faith in the machines they use to cast their ballots. On the heels of Gov. Tom Wolf unilaterally decertifying every voting machine in the Commonwealth, we need to know whether these new machines met expectations, whether they are reliable and whether they are not subject to interference,” said Rep. Grove (R-York).

Dominion had initially agreed to attend the hearing, before it “abruptly canceled,”  Grove said.

“Why would a vender of public goods fear discussing their product sold to the public for the public good? If Dominion’s products were successful and operated as they were supposed to, why wouldn’t Dominion take the opportunity to publicly review its success?” Grove demanded. “How hard is it to say, ‘our ballot machines worked exactly as promised and they’re 100 percent accurate’?”

“After weeks of accusations, why has Dominion Voting Systems not released any analysis of the success of its voting machines to the public in order to stop their accusers in their tracks? If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding from us?” he asked.

Today I am saddened to report to the taxpayers of Pennsylvania and the 1.3 million voters who trusted Dominion Voting Systems with their ballots, that Dominion Voting Systems has hung you out to dry and slapped you in your faces.” the committee chair declared.

Grove stated that Dominion’s behavior lent credibility to their accusers’ accusations.

 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/dominion-voting-lawyers-abruptly-backing-out-pennsylvania-fact-f...

 

 

Highlighted
Honored Advisor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)

The jacked-off in soup has been stirred by the chef, served by the waiters and the customers will soon receive their bill.   Separating the meat, potatoes, carrots and ***** is impossible at this point, the Left pulled off what 4 years of manufactured hoaxes and an impeachment couldn`t.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-11-20-theres-no-way-biden-won-georgia.html  

(Natural News) Try as they might to legitimize Joe Biden’s “win” in the state of Georgia, the left will never, ever have a clean conscience – assuming these people have consciences – about the obvious election fraud that took place there.

First of all, thousands of votes for President Trump – the total number likely would have pushed him over the top – basically disappeared into thin air. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of mystery votes for Biden conveniently appeared, almost as if it was right on cue.

Further, thousands of votes for Trump were “mistakenly” switched to Biden in several counties, and never returned. These three factors alone just about prove, all on their own, that Trump did, in fact, win the state of Georgia.

“I concluded from looking at these results that this was an irregularity, since there was no obvious reason for President Trump’s totals to have decreased while former Vice President Biden’s totals increased dramatically,” says Voters Organized for Trusted Elections Results in Georgia (Voter GA) co-founder Garland Favorito, who just this week filed a sworn affidavit with Georgia’s secretary of state’s office.

Favorito says that Biden’s count throughout the state was “artificially inflated” through several means, not the least of which include the Dominion Voting Systems that evidence shows threw the state for Biden.

“The software appears to have thrown votes from Trump to Biden here, too,” Favorito stated during an interview with RealClearInvestigations. “Or Biden ballots were manufactured.”

The glaring disparity of gains between Trump and Biden is “something I had never witnessed before in my years of election monitoring,” Favorito added.

Elections should also be fair and honest, regardless of which party’s candidate is in question

To be clear, Favorito is not a Republican, nor does he support President Trump. He is a bipartisan career IT professional who for decades has been advocating for election integrity in Georgia. Favorito simply wants to see fair and honest election results, no matter who is running.

With that said, it is clear to Favorito that Georgia’s results are neither fair nor honest, which he explains in his Nov. 10 affidavit that was sent to state elections head Brad Raffensperger.

Because of these looming discrepancies, Favorito is recommending that the state’s election be fully recounted by hand, with all of the necessary safeguards and accountability measures fully in place this time.

This has supposedly already happened, but as we noted the so-called “audit” and “recount” were nothing but a farce, thanks to the corruptive influence of Raffensperger.

Where that leaves us comes down to any pending lawsuits that could potentially overturn Georgia’s election results while hopefully prohibiting the same fraud from occurring on Jan. 5 when Georgia will hold two U.S. Senate run-off elections.

Conservatives had better hope that the Republican candidates win, otherwise the current Republican majority will shift to a 50-50 split, handing the reins of power to Kamala Harris to cast the tie-breaking vote.

Favorito is still focused on dealing with the presidential election results, though, as it is of critical importance to not let fraud prevail.

“One candidate could not go up by 20,000 and the other do nothing – in Fulton County or any county in Georgia,” Favorito contends. “That’s just not going to happen.”

“I think they’re going to find the root cause of the irregularity was something electronic, and I think it’s going to change the results substantially.”

Favorito adds that he does not believe the vote swaps to be isolated incidents but rather systemic throughout every area where electronic voting systems and mail-in drop boxes were used.

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)

Just an aside observation....what kind of sick, twisted, person would pick a name like "dominion" ?

 

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)


@rsbs wrote:

Just an aside observation....what kind of sick, twisted, person would pick a name like "dominion" ?

 


People, like George Soros, that want Dominion over the masses of people. 

Highlighted
Honored Advisor

Re: The Nights Lights Came On in Georgia (election)

Has to be a Democrat that`s into S & M and likes to be tied up and whipped.