Mixed thoughts on the MO governor -- yes to the horndog part, don't know about crook part. He had an affair, well before the election, who cares. Subsequent to his being elected, the mistress's estranged husband decided to make a big deal out of it -- had the election gone the other way, there probably wouldn't have been any actions taken. Everything seems to hinge on the "picture" taking -- haven't seen any picture, nobody seems to have offered one up, the mistress says it might have just been a dream and didn't actually see any picture taken nor any picture after, the mistress actually (reportedly) sent the governor (again, well prior to election) nude or semi-nude selfies herself. So, sounds to me like a bunch of butt-hurt demos from St Louis just trying to take down the governor for political reasons. Again, that's just my current opinion. Now, on the other hand, if THE picture comes out, then that would mean the governor lied about it, and my opinion of him takes a further nosedive. And, if he lies about it under oath, no problem with ousting him. It's not about the affair, it's not about the picture, it is about truth under oath and any other potential unlawful actions he might have taken AFTER he became governor.
