cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
NewAgJudge
Senior Contributor

Re: UH-OH

 

 

I did'nt bring this up, the burden is NOT on me.

 

Hello  !!!

Re: UH-OH

One thing that I thought about when the Bundy story was hot was about those really incredibly ordinary mongrel cattle that you would see in some of the footage. It wouldn't surprise me at all if it were to be discovered that there hadn't been a drop of blood drawn or the first vaccination administered any more than checks having been written to pay the rent. Any of these wise use bozos that I've ever encountered I professionally or otherwise, and there have been more than just a few (including a close by marriage relative who spent a stint in the crowbar hotel over a tax protest) are pretty sloppy operators. Their enterprises often no more than props for their ideology and dogma. So I the event that there would be a Federal play on Bundy or some other like character APHIS or some other arm of USDA might need to be involved.
schnurrbart
Veteran Advisor

Re: UH-OH

The burden of proof lies with the accuser not the accused so since you are doing the accusing...

schnurrbart
Veteran Advisor

Re: UH-OH

And in that it says, NO SOLICITATION DOCUMENT EXISTS.  From what I gather from reading it is that they have NOT solicited any at this time.

 

 

Taylor ECIL
Senior Contributor

Re: UH-OH

Breitbart is not a reliable source for ANYTHING

 

Your quote, the burden of disproof is on you. You can have an opinion but statements such as those require a fact to prove. Just because you do not like the article, or the source does not give right to shoot it down. If I am going to say I don't agree I will show facts as to why.

NewAgJudge
Senior Contributor

Re: UH-OH

 

Since you seem grossly misinformed, I will tutor you a bit :

 

Read, Weep  :

 

News organizations found, for example, that the ACORN videos–which purported to show a young Mr. Breitbart ally named James O'Keefe posing as a pimp seeking advice from the organization about how to establish a brothel and evade taxes–actually presented a heavily edited account of what had happened.

An investigation by the California attorney general's office concluded that O'Keefe had added footage of himself and an ally dressed in flamboyant costumes that they had not worn to ACORN's offices. By then, it was too late for ACORN: Outraged conservatives in Congress stripped the organization of federal funding.

 

The most interesting admission in the piece comes from Rich Lowry of theNational Review:

Lowry said Mr. Breitbart "wasn't a journalist in the traditional sense of dotting every i and crossing every t." As such, his journalistic lapses "didn't damage him on the right. He wasn't playing by the traditional media rules."

That's a fairly damning assessment of the right, from the right.    🙂

 

 

Taylor ECIL
Senior Contributor

Re: UH-OH

With that assesment all so called news agencies could be debunked. The problem I have is not you calling Brietbart or anybody else a fraud, it is not using sources to prove that what you disagree with is wrong. You play on emotions only that I can see yelling at any conservative on this forum that they are wrong, yet never brining up any source to show where they are wrong.  Opinions are like a******* everyone has one.

NewAgJudge
Senior Contributor

Re: UH-OH

 

 

Oh I have " sourced " many times here. Wether you see that, or know that, I dont even care.  I just hate when someone  slops up a link and doesnt bother to give a run down.

 

But you carry on now, I found some comedy gold via right wing palooza MILLIONS march on washington takin back ' Murica.

 

I've seem more people at a church picnic.

LMAO

Taylor ECIL
Senior Contributor

Re: UH-OH

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=9fc3a01217d03b0354e1e18b69aa7bad&tab=core&tabmo...&=

 

The actual request for those who don't like research.

The question is why do they need night sights and close uarter fire arms. The forestry service is under their jurisdiction, do they have alot of pot plots? I think that when the money runs out on welfare they are arming up to protect their offices from riots. My 2 cents.