USA's greatest threat

[cmilligan1958g]

---

@sdholloway56 wrote:

You really haven't answered to the question of whether, just maybe, farmers got rolled.

My take is that you're fairly representative- farmers are sabre rattlin' mad (probably root Our Troops on at the ballpark) rather than admit to it.

---

I’m pissed off that we got so dependent on the Communist (actually fascist) China regime. We must develop other markets and especially look for more promising ventures, such as industrial hemp production. The Red China dictatorship can deal with fallout of a starvation plagued population. Remember, China’s share of the world economy is 15%, as the United States is around 28%. China is NOT our friend. Their goal is to supersede us. 

[lemerik1958]

---

@rsbs wrote:

RJ, face the facts....the steer from Iowa...banned....the blunder from down under....banned, many times.....Obnox, has to change his names more times than BJ Clinton changed underwear and keeps bouncing back like the Pillsbury doughboy.....

The beef with SF was they were letting the anti-American crowd post here and censoring the real Americans. 

I imagine that you have been banned more than once too, with your internet tough guy persona.....how about it, true?

Bruce and his Canadian fellow socialist are reasonably polite these days, maybe they have been banned a few times, too. Most of the times I don't even read their postings, though, they seem incapable of even posting decent links.

need to head over to Craig’s site  he bans anyone that doesn’t drink Micro P’s kool aid  

---

[sdholloway56]

If you were sentient back in the 80s you will recall that a heavy bit of the background to the whole neoliberal project was the universal knowledge that "within a decade Japan will own everything."

So we must be "competitive", you know labor "flexibility", deregulated finance etc.

That turned out well.

[Canuck_2]

his Canadian fellow socialist

I assume that was aimed at me but i have never been banned.

Had a 'warning' one time that I should not point out that  your dear leader lost the election by 3 million votes but was selected by the system for the position.

Message said it was legal so i should not point it out.

Never figured out what the problem was as I never ever claimed it was not 'legal' just that the majority voted for someone else and your system, which your dear leader said was rigged, was selected.

[r3020]

Well he was not selected. He was elected by the majority of voters in a majority of states. The same system that Barack Obama said could not be rigged. If you are calling Barack Obama a liar then you are racist.

[Canuck_2]

You seem to have a problem reading or comprehending what was written.

I said nothing about Obama I just quoted what your dear leader said, that the system is rigged.

Of course he said that before it selected him and as much as you wish to believe otherwise the majority of voters indoor country did not vote for him but rather chose Mrs Clinton. It was your system that selected him.

An election indicates a vote where people have a choice.

Your system does not allow those making the selection a choice.

[r3020]

The voters had a choice and Trump was that choice for a majority of voters in a majority of sates. The system which Obama said could not be rigged. The system under which Hillary said Trump could not win. The system she claimed was her fire wall even if Trump won the popular vote because she claimed there was no chance Trump would carry enough states to win the election.

[Edmund55]

(Had a 'warning' one time that I should not point out that  your dear leader lost the election by 3 million votes but was selected by the system for the position.)

Those 3 million votes and a shout out to NY Governor Cuomo would get Hillary on as a guest of his brother Fredo on CNN's primetime.

[Canuck_2]

It really bothers you and 3020 when I point out the FACT that more voters wanted Clinton BUT your system selected your dear leader.

Why is that? Are you not comfortable with the truth?