Walking back Russia, Russia, Russia!

[gh2002gh]

---

@bruce MN wrote:

He did make referrals.  What was originally asked by your fellow DS was if he found anyone guilty. 

Try to stay in sequence.

And try to supply context with snipped bits. Read the Mueller letter. 

---

I like sequences Brucie, and because I do, I can show you are deflecting after having your butt handed to you yet again.  

You already replied to both of r3020's posts.  And then I made 2 posts, which your next response was:

HE found no one quilty.  That wasn’t up to him. 

That reply was to me, and I never stated any of the such.  You thought you could slip that BS by...

[gh2002gh]

r3020

Senior Advisor

5 hours ago

Re: Walking back Russia, Russia, Russia!

I thought that was Mueller job. He found one guilty of any crimes. Why will you dems not accept those findings?

SHARE 

REPLY

bruce MN

Advisor

4 hours ago

Re: Walking back Russia, Russia, Russia!

He found no one guilty.  That wasn’t his charge. Where do you get this crap?

SHARE 

REPLY

r3020

Senior Advisor

4 hours ago

Re: Walking back Russia, Russia, Russia!

He was to find if Trump worked with the russians to defeat Hillary.

SHARE 

REPLY

bruce MN

Advisor

4 hours ago

Re: Walking back Russia, Russia, Russia!

The inverse of that, but sorta, I guess.

Which he documented numerously in the report, but AG Barr determined day it was OK.

SHARE 

REPLY

gh2002gh

Senior Contributor

3 hours ago

Re: Walking back Russia, Russia, Russia!

@bruce MN wrote:

He found no one guilty.  That wasn’t his charge. Where do you get this crap?

Mueller made criminal referrals did he not?

SHARE 

REPLY

gh2002gh

Senior Contributor

3 hours ago

Re: Walking back Russia, Russia, Russia! 

@bruce MN wrote:

The inverse of that, but sorta, I guess.

Which he documented numerously in the report, but AG Barr determined day it was OK.

Lol...you do love to repeat the lie that Mueller documented wrong doing by Trump (ad nauseam technique of propoganda).   

Mueller didn't send a criminal referral for President Trump, why not?

Mueller stated that he did not disagree with Barr's letter.

Why do you attempt to deceive so much Brucie? 

Does your mother and all of her friends (Band wagon propoganda technique) know?

You should have walked away! 😉

bruce MN

Advisor

HE found no one quilty.  That wasn’t up to him. 

Your memory is either failing, or you cant keep up with all the mistruths....  which is it?

[gh2002gh]

And so it doesn't get lost, I saved this part for last...

Thank you for admitting what Mueller had responsibility in doing... making criminal referrals of which he did. 

And also for admitting by not answering that he did not make one regarding President Donald J Trump. 

Your attempt to not respond is actually louder than had you just answered honestly. 😉

But who at this point expects you to answer anything honestly?  Quite sad, but the end justifies any means right Brucie?  

[bruce MN]

I doubt that anyone ever expected a criminal referral against Denison.

He was looking into Russian interference in the election. He and no end of others have found that. Barr said “No big deal” and he held the floor. 

Which technically changed nothing but did alter the politics and the reporting. 

Somehow a certain portion of observers took that to mean game over. Move on. ‘ceptin that some bothered to examine the Report. 

Those Russia issues actually have very little to do with the inquiry that is being held now. As you say, Denison and Rudy etal should have “walked away”.

[bruce MN]

Lev Parmas just cracked the news cycle. 

You’re going to have to take a couple of hours at your trusted sources to index the obligatory talking points for your response.

[gh2002gh]

---

@bruce MN wrote:

Lev Parmas just cracked the news cycle. 

You’re going to have to take a couple of hours at your trusted sources to index the obligatory talking points for your response.

---

I actually prefer the truth Brucie, might take me a few days to read up on a particular subject matter that just "cracked" a news cycle.  

I dont fall for the say something first BS such as yourself... it's much more enjoyable to let you say something completely wrong and then watch you try to lie your way out while doing anything but having character and admitting that you were wrong.  

It's quite entertaining....so by all means... you have the floor. 😉

[gh2002gh]

---

@bruce MN wrote:

I doubt that anyone ever expected a criminal referral against Denison.

He was looking into Russian interference in the election. He and no end of others have found that. Barr said “No big deal” and he held the floor. 

Which technically changed nothing but did alter the politics and the reporting. 

Somehow a certain portion of observers took that to mean game over. Move on. ‘ceptin that some bothered to examine the Report. 

Those Russia issues actually have very little to do with the inquiry that is being held now. As you say, Denison and Rudy etal should have “walked away”.

---

Lololol.... long way to say no criminal referral was made.  😂

You use a lot of words Brucie, but you have yet to call the following false....   

Mueller's own words regarding Barr's letter:

[r3020]

He was looking into COLLUSION between russia and Trump  fixing an election. The ONLY people who didn't expect a criminal referral were those who spied on the Trump campaign. They bet everything on Trump firing Mueller and then impeaching Trump on obstruction of justice. They bet everything on Mueller never writing a report.

[bruce MN]

Finally found a reprint of the Wash Post article (and full context) that snip comes from:

https://www.masslive.com/news/2019/04/mueller-complained-ag-barrs-summary-didnt-capture-context-of-t...

The Report stands and remains. 

[rsbs]

And Donald J. Trump still stands and remains POTUS.

Maybe after the 2020 election, President Trump will have more flexibility to deal with Russia and the Ukraine.