cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Senior Advisor

You can draw only one conclusion.

After listening to Andre Carson insist that tea party members want to see blacks hanging from trees, one must conclude that Ojimmy Bin hoffa and the union taliban want to see tea party members lying in the streets in pools of blood.

22 Replies
Highlighted
Advisor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

Creating an enemy is all they've got to keep them from being consumed by their own following.
Highlighted
Veteran Advisor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.


@Samnospam wrote:
Creating an enemy is all they've got to keep them from being consumed by their own following.

The Tea Party Patriots are the same to Herr Obama und his "Union Army", as the Jews were to the Third Reich.  Both were "strawmen" to be destroyed in order to seize total control and power.Palin_Event_USA-TEAPARTY.jpg

Highlighted
Veteran Advisor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

Why?  Because he called for everyone get out and vote to take take them out?  Probably if they got voted out of office many of them would committ suicide.

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

And as we all have observed, Obama is doing a fine job of consolidating his Socialist (or is it Fascist?) left wing power base. Here's a partial list of appealing accomplishments that are sure to make liberals swoon with love for Obama and be able to use them as patsies to "seize total control and power" :

 

Bank & Wall Street bailouts

No mortgage reform or regulations worth having

Auto-maker bailouts

Extending Bush tax cuts to the highest income makers

Passing on implementing Bush Ozone regulations

Passing on closing Gitmo

Staying in Iraq and Afghanistan

Eased up on offshore drilling and talking about "clean coal"

Passed on doing anything about carbon emissions

No stomach for closing tax loopholes for corporations, not even jets

Angers the black caucus for not doing enough

 

I think there are many out there that just aren't feeling the love. What part of the base did he miss with sharing his love?

 

Honestly Craig, if you really and truly believe the dung you post here sometimes, I'm worried about you because I know somewhere deep down you are indeed a rational human being. I guess you can't resist slinging it around when a fresh load is in your hand.

Highlighted
Advisor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

Hence they need an enemy. Focus on the enemy.
Highlighted
Honored Advisor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

You left out one on your list, extend the "Patriot Act", see that Libya, Gitmo and all that other war stuff didn`t buy him one extra vote.  The Donald Rumsfeld crowd that it would appeal to won`t vote for him anyway.  So, you have one of two reasons that Obama went back on his campaign promises, No. 1  there really is a terror threat and he found that out in office and was advised to "play it safe".  No. 2  There`s a shadowy group of Rockefellers and Rothchilds that want us fighting over there and regardless whose President, we will be at war.  All of you that voted for Obama in `08 will also vote for him a year from this November...what would you Libs even consider voting for a Mit Romney? Smiley Happy   Obama will lose because he`s losing the Independents in droves, now that they found out that he`s a dud.  No matter how you cut it the only reason he won in `08 was because he`s a Black guy and a Democrat, none of you knew anything else about him.  Hilary and every other Dem seeking the nomination had oodles more history(it`s still a question if O was born here) and experience than Barack.  I know it`s unpopular to say but it`s the truth.  

Highlighted
Veteran Advisor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

First off, the far left will NOT vote for anyone with an R next to their name, so Obama doesn't have to worry about losing their votes to whoever is on the other side of the ballot.  All he has to do is pander enough to the middle and get re-elected.

It does work both ways, as no far-righter will vote for Obama, either.

 

As far as Hoffa goes, he probably is starting to worry about his $368,000 a year (total compensation) job.  All funded by Union dues.

 

http://www.unionfacts.com/employee/Teamsters/JAMES/HOFFA

 

 

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

Well, too bad there won't be more choices is all that I can say about that.

 

No matter what happens, there will still be Unions because the Constitution pretty much covers their rights. I heard a piece about Unions the other day. It seems that they have moved from more or less working for labor rights in general (minimum wage, 40 hour week, overtime, lunch breaks, shifts, etc - all that old stuff we take for granted) to working with specific employers for benefits specific to them. That tends to make the larger public less warm to unions - in it for themselves instead of everyone.

Highlighted
Senior Contributor

Re: You can draw only one conclusion.

I have wondered what votes he thinks these things will get him. I guess he knows that democrats really don't have a choice anyway. The lines are pretty well drawn even without a clear republican frontrunner.