- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
Farmers supply all that information and some of them aren't honest about it. I know a few around here that I suspect aren't honest with their yield reporting but I would be surprised if its more than a few. They go out of business eventually because you can't make a living long term on crop insurance. I look for some to be out after 2014 with prices being what they are. But still, fraud is fraud and it shouldn't happen. In most cases it shouldn't be allowed and it is anyway, by insurance agents who don't want to po a customer or by a lazy claims person. Same with medicare/medicaid. Fraud is allowed in most cases even when it's plain for all to see.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
Explain to us what those on SNAP, govt. housing, WIC, and the rest of the alphabet programs contribute, hobby?
And don't do it with your mouth full of farmer created food.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
No doubt there's some crooks getting money they're not entitled to but hobby is only obsessed with a tiny fraction of an ice cubed sized part of the massive iceberg.......................
A state audit has revealed that Massachusetts has given out $18 million in “questionable public assistance benefits” in recent years, in cases that included the distribution of benefits to more than 1,160 people who were either dead or using the Social Security number of a deceased person.
In some cases, recipients began receiving benefits for the first time after their deaths.
The audit, issued Tuesday, covered cash, food stamps, and other benefits intended for low-income families, and found millions of dollars in irregular benefits and an urgent need for improved anti-fraud security.
In 1,164 cases, deceased recipients continued to receive a total of $2.39 million in benefits up to 27 months after they had been reported dead. The state Department of Transitional Assistance also paid out at least $368,000 benefits to 178 guardians who claimed deceased persons as dependents, and $164,000 to 40 individuals being claimed by more than one guardian.
Additionally, State Auditor Suzanne Bump found suspicious transitions on electronic benefit cards amounting to $15 million, including almost $5 million in which all food benefits had been withdrawn at once. Meanwhile, five regional offices could not provide documentation for more than 30,000 EBT cards.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
You explain to me how chillren, disabled ,elderly, and those low wage people( 8.00/ 10.00) can contribute ? People like you have the idea they all lazy drunken dopers bums. You should get away from your sheltered govt supported farm. How stupid the lame excuse for your govt support don't do it with a full mouth. Don't farm if you can't support yourself wthout govt handouts.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
@schnurrbart wrote:
Do you think it might be OK for all businesses to be able to "break even at best"?
No. Subsidies insurance manipulates the markets. It allows government to pick winners and losers. The same will be true with government run health care. Fraud and manipulation. The patients will only be pawns.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
Ah yeah still stuck in the "widows, children, orphans" myth.
The govt. bureaucrats have no incentives to get people off welfare, because if they did, the govt bureaucrat is out of their cushy job.
And besides, the Dims gotta to keep their welfare captive voters on the Dim plantation for their votes. Give them their free obamaPhone, free food, free housing, and they'll figure out how to work it with the crooked store owner to get their booze, cash and cigarettes.
Let me know when you want to focus on the real welfare fraud hobby, and we can then talk about the farm program. I want to eliminate it all.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
If you are true to your words then get together with your fellow farmer welfare recipients and DON"T SIGN up for the govt welfare handout guaranteed support programs...... Its so easy so simple evn a farmer could figure that out,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
Just a question to clarify my understanding. Do you think those insurance benefits are paid directly by the taxpayer or is the taxpayer exposure only to the extent of the premium subsidy?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: crop ins payts
Is it not true that the revenue insurance provides for income loss via lower prices? And does that supplemental income come from the taxpayer or the insurance company that wrote the policy.
It is my understanding that the government is subsidizing premiums on the affordable care act. There after the responsibility for that medical expenses are the insurance company's responsibility, the insured and not the government.