- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
jhk explains the intent of hr1
for instance: HR1, the “For the People [ha!] Act,” designed to maximally enable election fraud by enrolling as many live bodies as possible to vote with no chance of verifying their identities, age, place of residence, or citizenship. The act would certainly introduce many new layers of chaos and delay in ascertaining election results. It would also take away the states’ constitutional duty to fashion their own election requirements and, in the process, further erode the legitimacy of the federal government and give many states more reason to oppose and nullify it, or even secede from it — meaning, another step toward that looming civil war 2.0.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
Yes.
Surrender, or there will be Civil War.
Please inform me as to who has or will vote who isn’t legally entitled to.
You must submit the proof along with your allegations.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
“I don’t trust the integrity of elections cuz some people are sayin’*”
*I’d provide the abundant evidence except.....”
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
What do you find wrong with these provisions under SEC. 1502. Paper ballot and manual counting requirements? Shouldn't it alleviate most concerns?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1/text#toc-HCB806A18E6E545B49D6997D6AE9995EB
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
It doesn’t alleviate the “wrong” people being able to vote.
Jen
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
“People”, them being the general public have proven that they will seek out what they want to believe and are good at locating it. However, the one thing that halfway cognitive humans are all instinctively tuned to recognizing is when something is being approached out of desperation..
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
Have show ID to dump your grass clippings in LaCrosse. But same people have a issue with showing a id to vote
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
@KNAPPer wrote:
What do you find wrong with these provisions under SEC. 1502. Paper ballot and manual counting requirements? Shouldn't it alleviate most concerns?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1/text#toc-HCB806A18E6E545B49D6997D6AE9995EB
No it doesn't alleviate most concerns.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
HR1 polling well with Republican voters
It’s got the Masterclass rattled.
Dennison shine might becoming off.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Re: jhk explains the intent of hr1
It was probably just as well that you and Red never got yourselves involved in Republican politics, being classic little people as you are.
Look what these “swells” are fretting about.
Apparently they somehow thought there were more of you:
https://www.politicususa.com/2021/03/29/mitch-mcconnell-kochs-election-reform.html