First, you pick the worst possible case, world energy production/consumption then you show the situation up to the present before the build-out of any significant renewables.
In 2016, 5 years ago now, NREL produced a report where they used lidar (radar) and estimated that 23% of the roof surfaces of 128 major cities were suitable for rooftop solar and would provide 1.9 terawatt-hr of our current 3.9 terawatt-hr consumption.
Similarly, an NREL report indicated the wind power production of 10,8 terawatt-hr using just the windiest sites in a conservative estimate.
Obviously, there will be a production-consumption matching issue at least the production potential is well within the range of consumption.
Not only that, but this year the nuclear fusion reactor achieved breakeven. It is entirely possible that the energy question might be solved sooner than you think.
But the more important issue now is whether we continue to allow our societies to be held hostage by the fossil fuel producing counties & companies.
Unless of course, that's your objective, convince everybody it isn't worth trying to change.
