... you'd see that there is a pretty good relationship between measurable parameters, things like mask use and social distancing and infections per M population and deaths per M. It's just that there really that much difference between say, California or Texas & Florida. Mask use in Texas & Florida is about 70% while California is 79%, likewise, social distance (cellphone data) for California is a little better -25% as opposed to -20% for Texas & Florida. Deaths per M are 1547, 1608 & 1721 for CA, FL, & TX respectively.
You want to know who's done really well, Vermont, 86% mask use, 348 deaths per M.
Obviously, there are major differences among states as per initial population density (urban vs. rural) that account for much of the outcomes. And just as obviously, you can call for a lockdown but if you don't enforce it, it won't work.
As far as lockdowns go, you just have to look at NYC last spring. An enforced lockdown brought daily new infections from more than 10,000 per day down to less than 1000 per day within a month & a half.
So, stop making ridiculous comments completely unsupported by any data.
