Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
9 Replies

Re: those libs want syrian intervention

BA Deere
Honored Advisor

Re: those libs want syrian intervention

The only thing NOT liberal about McCain was his choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate and that was to keep from totally getting skunked at the polls. As to what Romney would do with Syria, we unfortunately will never know. I know that he said "such and such" however what do you do in a campaign say "yeah I agree with the current commander in chief of doing for him" . What I'm saying is media and public opinion would prevent another "Republican" war.

Re: those libs want syrian intervention                                                                                           ------------snip-If the following from France’s second largest newspaper Le Figaro is accurate, then we must assume that war is now a foregone conclusion.

According to our information, the regime’s opponents, supervised by Jordanian, Israeli and American commandos moving towards Damascus since mid-August. This attack could explain the possible use of the Syrian president to chemical weapons.

    According to information obtained by Le Figaro , the first trained in guerrilla warfare by the Americans in Jordan Syrian troops reportedly entered into action since mid-August in southern Syria, in the region of Deraa. A first group of 300 men, probably supported by Israeli and Jordanian commandos, as well as men of the CIA, had crossed the border on August 17. A second would have joined the 19. According to military sources, the Americans, who do not want to put troops on the Syrian soil or arming rebels in part controlled by radical Islamists form quietly for several months in a training camp set up at the border Jordanian- Syrian fighters ASL, the Free Syrian Army, handpicked.        Translation via Zero Hedge  


----What’s equally as intriguing as boots on the ground inside of the Syrian border is the fact that these troops and intelligence officers reportedly made their way into the country on August 17th, fully four days before reports and images surfaced showing hundreds of men, women and children killed by a chemical weapons attack allegedly at the hands of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.                                 

    The purported attack, which some experts argue was a set-up, left even the pacifist government of France calling for military intervention. Furthermore, should UN investigators, who conveniently happen to be in-country investigating possible chemical weapons stockpiles, confirm that the attack did take place, then we can expect armed military confrontation in the middle east once again.

    Of interest is also the fact the NASDAQ stock market exchange was halted today due to what NASDAQ officials call a technical glitch. Within hours of the ‘glitch’ cyber security experts suggested that this was no accident, but rather, a hack attackoriginating from the “hacking collective” known as the Cyber Fighters of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam, an Iranian backed organization.

     Earlier this week President Obama met with the heads of the Federal Reserve, the SEC, the FDIC and several other agencies responsible for monitoring and implementing U.S. financial, economic and monetary policy, indicating that there could be a serious crisis unfolding behind the scenes of our financial system. This comes on the heels of the Federal Reserve claiming that they would begin to “taper” the stimulus, a move that would likely send massive shock waves through domestic and global stock markets.

    This is all speculation, of course, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that the US financial system is potentially on the brink of a massive re-collapse, while the Obama administration is actively engaging Syria in what we can only conclude will lead to a broader conflict in the middle east.

     Throughout history governments have deflected blame for economic disasters by turning their efforts to a far off enemy and going to war. It’s certainly no accident and it’s a forecast that contrarian observers have made repeatedly as the global economic crisis deepened.

Is this what we’re seeing play out right now?     


  If so, then the implications are far reaching, because anyone who thinks this is going to be another Iraq are kidding themselves. This time, the Russians and the Chinese have a stake in the game, and they too have been positioning pieces on the Grand Chessboard. Not only have the Russians already advised western nations that the Syrians will be armed with weapons never before seen in the middle east, but they have warned that any military confrontation in the region could potentially go nuclear.


  The question then becomes: who were the Russians talking about?     

  Syria doesn’t have nuclear weapons. Neither does Iran (at least not for a few more months if Israeli intelligence reports are to be believed).

     But the United States, Israel, Russia and China do have nukes.

    Thus, one can only conclude that the Russians were talking about a nuclear engagement between them… and us.


   It’s a realistic possibility also put forth by survival specialist Joel Skousen in his documentary Strategic Relocation and a warning reiterated by a DHS Insider who claimed in June of 2013 that a World War was about to break out and would lead to the deaths of millions.


  This is getting real folks. All signs point to a serious confrontation in our near future.


Practice duck and cover


Global Research reports:

The Patriot Missiles will be hit and repealed with S 300 SAM [already installed in Syria]Putin also threatened to deliver the more advanced S400 anti-aircraft missiles (see image below) far superior to the Patriot missiles and ranked as the World’s most advanced air defense system.




He added that Russia will also supply Syria with state-of –the-art 24-Barrell rocket launcherswhich have a range of 60 km ranked as the most developed artillery weapon of its kind.(see video below)

He added that Russia will supply 400 of these launchers which will be able to destroy all targets around Syria’s borders.


    The British intelligence site stated that Putin threatened to send other secret Russian made weapons to Syria which would tip the balance of power even further in favour of Syria and re-iterated that these weapons will not be used against Israel on condition that Israel will not participate in the war within Syria and neighbouring countries. {Lebanon, Jordan]


  Putin’s response came just over 24 hours after Obama’s statement on Saturday that he was going to arm the Syrian resistance.


     Putin clearly stated that the Middle East is going to witness a significant change.  Syria will be armed with weapons that have never been seen before [in the Middle East] including computer guided smart missiles that never miss their target.

     He also added that Russia will supply Syria with Skean 5 ground -to-sea missiles that are capable of hitting and sinking any target up to 250 km off the Syrian coast.           Full report: Global Research     ---------------------While the weapons being supplied to Syria by both sides are a far cry from nuclear meltdown, the current policies of both nations can very quickly metastasize into a much more direct confrontation.

   Vladimir Putin comes from the old world of Soviet leadership; one that believes in Russian military superiority and rules with an iron fist. He has no qualms about going to war if he finds it necessary to the long-term interests of Russia.                                                                              


   In the United States, President Barrack Obama is embroiled in numerous scandals and is presiding over an economy on the brink of collapse, giving him ample motivation to divert the attention of the public.

     Neither of these leaders, given their past, would give pause to the thought of killing millions of people if they believe it was in their interest, or in the interest of their globalist handlers.                          

    Wars in the 20th century, most democidal in origin, claimed the lives of hundreds of millions of people.    Just statistics in the history books to leadership circles in the upper echelons of our governing apparatus.     The lives of innocents have been sacrificed on the alters of power, greed and corruption since the dawn of man.








BA Deere
Honored Advisor

Re: those libs want syrian intervention

So the current commander in chief is a "neo-con" as well as a democrat? Lucky us, we get the worst of all worlds socialized medicine, free college, push for gun control and another war to go on the credit card. With Republicans taking the blame, given this presidents Teflon coating, I don't doubt it.

Re: those libs want syrian intervention

Well, Here we go, World War III with Russia ,and for what? A bunch of sand fleas?

I better read up again about Armageddon in The Book of Revelations.

Re: those libs want syrian intervention

Not so sure about the Teflon Coating.. I am seeing a lotta "chipping" all along the edges. Either way, everything is approved by the Zionists ahead of time.

Re: those libs want syrian intervention

  Whine whine whine.  The GOP and it's parrots are so persecuted.    RvsD Idiotic fixation.   Never mind the reality the puppets work for the same criminals, just play the blame game.  Same old same old, another day and the same tune.

Senior Advisor

Re: those libs want syrian intervention

@johnaa wrote:

  Whine whine whine.  The GOP and it's parrots are so persecuted.    RvsD Idiotic fixation.   Never mind the reality the puppets work for the same criminals, just play the blame game.  Same old same old, another day and the same tune.

There is only one person in America that can order an intervention into syria.