cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Senior Contributor

.

 
34 Replies
Senior Contributor

Thanks for the link

Really enjoyed the read...the author delved into some of the questions that I had framed about what Obama really is thinking, and reaches some very frightening conclusions.

 

Not the sort of read for the faint hearted or for those easily upset.

 

The comments were good, too.

 

Obama undoubtably is the first non-American president, and it is hard to believe that, with his views, he ever won any elective office in America.

 

Can an impeachment vote be held for lack of confidence?  I wonder if there is legal grounds to impeach a sitting president, and his vice president, because the legislature lacks confidence in their abilities to govern.

 

We really need a firm hand to right this ship, and soon.

Senior Contributor

Re: Thanks for the link

you mean he thinks ---i thought the muslims just programed it in every day ---there is no way he is smart enough to think on his own

Senior Contributor

another thought

"Americans "consume more than 20% of the world's oil but have less than 2% of the world's resources."

How much of the worlds resources does Japan have and how much do they consume?  Japan, an island nation has no resources beyond its people.  That was one of the roots of WWII.

Senior Contributor

Re: another thought

Japan, like France, runs on nuclear energy. In one of the world's paradoxes, the Japanese are the only country to have their citizens incinerated by nuclear bombs, and they embrace nuclear power plants to furnish their electric needs.

 

I am sure they import their fuel needs, but they have a sane fuel policy, not like the cheap gas policy that has been in place in America forever.

Senior Contributor

Re: another thought

And one other thought...anyone that believes that Japan is not capable of bombing China back into the stone age on a weeks notice, with atomic weapsons, is very naive, in spite of what any nuclear proliferation board will tell you officially.

Advisor

one of the comments

this guy gets it.

 

Posted by Alamitos_Bay | 09/16/10 11:30 PM EDT
What this country needs is a truly LIBERAL president and congress and judiciary! And I forgive the reader for suspecting that this must be some kind of bad joke!

But the Democrats believe in "statism" - not "liberalism."

They benefit from the imprecise American political terminology - we say "the government" here in the USA - rather than "the state." And that's a dangerous problem. Famous brands of statism in recent centuries have been Nazism, socialism, fascism, communism, and welfare statism - this last is sort of a mix of fascism and socialism.

Liberalism, on the other hand, is a political philosophy of small, cheap government - it is a constabulary - and the job of a liberal government is to enforce human rights within its own jurisdiction. I speak of the unalienable and perfectly-natural and universally-valid human rights of life, liberty, private property, and the pursuit of personal happiness.

The first article of private property is "the self" and all other rights are derivatives of and flow from these cardinal rights. These rights - The Rights of Man - are the gift of nature or of nature's god - and they belong to all human beings, everywhere.

Show me a Democrat who subscribes to all of the above, without qualifications or weasel words. The words "liberal" and "liberalism" were hijacked by the Democrats and socialists and fascists long ago - and it was the mistake of conservatives and libertarians to let them get away with it.

It is long past time that liberalism be reclaimed, defined, and explained by its rightful owners - by the champions of freedom, i.e.: not by Democrats.

Well, how about "progressivism?" Whuzzat?! â??Cancerâ?? is â??progressive,â?? too. Isn't â??progressivismâ?? just another statist cancer? It chews you up, piece by piece, in the name of Da Peepul? Eat Da Rich? Moral cannibalism, anyone?

Declare yourselves to be "liberals," then - kick over the bloody coffee tables - and overthrow and trounce the Democrats in 2010
Senior Contributor

Re: one of the comments

Thanks for bringing that one out, Sam. I had missed it...so many replies on that site.

 

I think many here are statists...I have compared them to tories that would have resisted the founding fathers and stayed loyal to King George. I wonder if they even celebrate the fourth of July?

 

We need more "liberals"!

Advisor

Re: How Obama Thinks

Another angle:

 

http://socyberty.com/issues/white-house-insider-part-2-the-president-needs-to-grow-up/#ixzz0zkUVRJHK

White House Insider Part 2: "The President needs to grow up."


Once again we have the privilege of speaking with someone from within the Obama team – a former member of the Obama campaign and transition team, and longtime Washington DC political insider. This is the follow up to our original discussion that took place a few weeks ago.


So you still wish to keep your name hidden from the public? Why? I intend to remain working in this town for a bit longer. A public disclosure might complicate that just a bit given who is in power right now. But I won’t be the last one from the current administration coming forward. After the midterms, there will be a number of us speaking about what is really going on in the Democrat Party, if for nothing else because it’s such a **bleep** mess right now.

What do you mean “it’s a **bleep** mess”? I mean just what I said. The Democrat Party is the most chaotic I have ever seen it – and that goes back almost 30 years.

So who is to blame? We all are. By we I mean those of us who were working within the party power structure the last ten years or so. We got so caught up in the hate Bush mentality, we let the party get hijacked by our own far left. That was disaster the moment it happened. The disaster that will be the midterm election in 2010 started in November of 2006 when Pelosi and Reid took over the Democrat Party. Those two have only brought trouble to the Democrat Party since day one of that time.


How do you mean? (A long pause…) Look, I’ve been in the Democrat Party in one way or other, be it campaigns, fundraising, lobbying, whatever…we lost our way in 2006. We put in place a Speaker of the House who is an absolute public relations train wreck. The lady is a… She’s tough. Yeah, she’s real tough. But outside of the halls of Congress, forget it. She’s a nut to the American people because America was and is a right of center country. As a Democrat I say that, because I understand it. Bill Clinton understood it. Pelosi, Reid, Obama…they don’t accept that fact.


You mention Clinton a lot. Yeah, I do because Bill Clinton was the very best politician of our time and I got to see it up close for a period of time and I am still amazed at just how good he was. Second, I think Bill Clinton was a **bleep** good president. He should be recognized more for just how good he really was.

And you don’t place Obama in the same league as Bill Clinton? (Laughter) Hell no. Obama has only been in office a couple of years, so that isn’t even a fair question right now. But what I have seen of Barack Obama has not left me with the confidence to say he will be as good a president as Bill Clinton. Maybe he will get it figured out before 2012, and I sure as hell hope so because the Republicans are getting some real oddballs running their own show over there and that scares me too.

What scares you more as president – Sarah Palin or Barack Obama? (Hands to head) Oh boy. What a choice! People would kill me for saying this – actually you know what, there are more and more of us Democrats saying what I am going to say in one form or another… Sarah Palin understands America more than Barack Obama. Yes, she has a minority of our far left who hates her, and some in our media are part of that group, but overall, she seems to get America. Americans aren’t a complicated people, and neither is Sarah Palin, so that probably works in her favor. But President Obama is just out of touch. He really doesn’t understand what America is. What it’s about. Or who it is. And that is a real problem for him – and the Democrat Party at this moment in its history.

Are you saying you would vote for Sarah Palin over Barack Obama? No, I don’t think I could do that. As much as I admire Palin’s ability to connect with the American people, I just can’t stand her politics. I am a pro-choice Democrat. I support unions. I support welfare programs. Sarah Palin understands America, but that doesn’t mean she understands the best parts of America. That being said, I think President Obama understands hardly any of America. That is probably a big reason he appears so lost these days.

Last time you mentioned trouble with the Obama marriage. I am not going to ask you to elaborate on that specifically, but could you tell us if you like Michelle Obama? Like is not a word we use in D.C. very much. Do I respect the First Lady? Sure. She seems like a strong woman, a good mother. I wasn’t around her really enough to say anything more than that. Or, at least, I would rather not.

Were you afraid of her? No – not anymore than anyone else who was around her as briefly as I was. Here is what I get from the First Lady. She is very much the Chicago ideologue. Nancy Pelosi is the far left of the Democrat Party, right? Well, Michelle Obama might be to the left of Nancy Pelosi. She really doesn’t care for how things work in the country and she wants to see it all changed. I can respect that, though I would guess she is far too liberal even for me – and I consider myself a liberal Democrat.

Could she be mean? Mean? She’s the First Lady. She is a strong, influential woman in America. I don’t know what you are trying to ask me there – though I suspect what you are trying to get at and all I will say to that is, “Don’t go there.”

If you had President Obama here right now and you could give him some advice that he would follow, what would that advice be? (Long silence. Eyes closed – long sigh) Man, that’s a tough question right there. I have thought about it a lot lately. I know I’m not the only one who left that White House feeling really let down, but maybe that wasn’t fair to the President. Maybe our own expectations got so high that he had no choice but to let us down…some advice, huh? Hopefully without sounding disrespectful, I would tell the President to pull his head out of his ass. To man up, grow up, and start to pay attention to what the American people want and need. That is a big-big flaw with this president. He comes at it from the position of thinking he knows what we need because we don’t have the ability to know for ourselves. And he doesn’t respect any opinion that is different from his own. He just doesn’t care to know any other side to any given issue. I really believe it’s a maturity thing. I think our president needs to grow up. I hate to put it that way, but there it is. President Obama – grow up.

Senior Contributor

Re: How Obama Thinks

Good Stuff...thanks for sharing,

 

I think you could add about six posters in here to the group that really doesn't understand America,either, or..if they do...they hate America as it is.

 

I would like to see someone explore more of Michele Obama....her relationships to the Bill Ayers, Jerimiah Wrights, and the rest of the America haters. I bet there are volumes to explore there.

 

And Barry's mother, too. She must have been attracted to the non-mainstream America types to marry first a wife beater and drunk from Kenya, and then a Muslim man from Indonesia.

 

I remember a fourth of July party back in 2008 , before we were blessed with the Obama event....and one person at the party made the comment about how nice it would be to say with an American president. I construed that to mean that he was part of the birther doubters, but now I wonder if he wasn't on to something much deeper. It was a pretty intelligent fellow that made that statement.