Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Honored Advisor

Set-a-side discussion from other site  

When I saw the post title, I automatically knew a fair number if not most would be shooting down the setaside idea with "Brazil`ll just pick up the business", that is as far as the analysis goes.  I`ll go to my stand by devil`s advocate question of "Does John Deere keep producing $200,000 tractors if they aren`t profitable?".  

If I recall correctly we had surpluses so large in the 80`s and 90`s that we almost didn`t need to raise the next years crop with a setaside  and that`s when the CRP got rolling too.  We were covered in grain and Brazil never shut the Cats off clearing more ground.  

Maybe Brazil and Ukraine etal will "pick up the slack" but aren`t they already "picking up the slack" with our supposed low prices?   I don`t know about you, but I`d rather get higher prices than low if Brazil regardlessly "picks up the slack". 

IMO have a voluntary setaside with a price 'carrot" to those participating and only do one year at a time, that way if market conditions change we are only months from putting the hammer down.  And if you`re happy with the current $3.60 corn and $8.50 beans then don`t participate and continue with your hammer down. 

But with the demographic makeup of the country, I don`t know if the AOCs and Ilhan Omars would support a program that Stephen Colbert would surely describe as "paying farmers not to farm".

0 Kudos
1 Reply
Senior Advisor

Re: Set-a-side discussion from other site

Take  the   M  F  P ,   and  have  a  personal ,  non- governmental  ,  set - a - side  of  say  20.20 % ,  instead  of  a  U S D A  ran  deal  - - -

Just  20%  on  corn  acres  and  we  could  be  at  the  27%  level  of  world  production,  leaving  our  current  position  of  the  34%  level,   a  number  stated  by  an   Iowa  University   - - -

Would  there  be  a leveraged  savings  on  crop  in$urance,  or   on  input  co$t$  -  ?      

0 Kudos